To: raybbr
Kelo was all for nothing.
Didn't Kelo have to surrender his property??
To: RushingWater
The City eventually agreed to move Kelo’s house to a new location and to pay substantial additional compensation to other homeowners. The redeveloper was unable to obtain financing and had to abandon the redevelopment project, leaving the land as an empty lot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
10 posted on
08/16/2010 8:11:42 PM PDT by
packrat35
(I got your tag line..)
To: RushingWater
Didn't Kelo have to surrender his property??Yes, she did. The lot remains empty today, though. That's why it turned out to be a complete waste.
11 posted on
08/17/2010 4:38:00 AM PDT by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson