[allmendream]

You stated your criteria initially. Unless science credited God as “directing” evolution (a non-scientific claim that no evidence for or against can be gathered) it is anti-God.

So unless a scientists says God is “directing” the planets, the theory of universal gravitational attraction of mass is “anti-God”?

So unless a scientists says God is “directing” the movement of the geological plates, the theory of plate techtoncis is “anti-God”?

Unless a scientists says God is “directing” the movement of electrons, the theory of electromagnetism is “anti-God”?

Way to show your absolutism and your absolute ignorance!

[alstewartfan]

You know this is a false argument, AMD. These other disiplines can PROVE satisfactorily that you can go from point A to point B and beyond, using experimentation. Evolution posits that modification through descent, over millions of years, can transform an amoeba into a cat, elephant or human being. This has NOT been proven, and if it could be, would a “god” be necessary at all for life?
Of course, God is necessary for other physical disciplines as well, but we are talking about HOW things work, not WHY they work when we study them. Scientists WANT our young people to believe that all that exists does not need God to be explained, and you KNOW this. Bob