And what do you suggest, limit mans ability to go into the woods. You sound like a leftist who agrees that people belong in the city where the government can control us.
Look into the history of this and you will see that the wolf was NEVER in danger of going extinct.
The only thin in danger of going extinct is every Americans RIGHT to go into the woods because idiots like you are worried about man infringing upon the animals world.
It seems this way only because you make a leap of faith, a logical fallacy, in your thinking:
"The only thin in danger of going extinct is every Americans RIGHT to go into the woods"
Nobody has deprived you of that right. What you insist is that you should be able to go to the woods in complete safety. What's next? Should we pay for some people to escort you there and kill mosquitoes around you, lest you may be bitten and infected with lime decease? Should we remove trees with protruding branches so that your Highness will not trip and brake his leg?
You are free to go to the woods. Do so at YOUR own risk.
"People following you and because idiots like you"
So, who does sound like a leftist? Mere disagreement with your point of view results in name-calling. No questions, no discussion. Even some of my liberal friends are more inquisitive and tolerant to ideas.
I don't take any offense: people who so hastily and without reason call resort to name-calling only underscore their own ignorance and the inability to think. The logical fallacy in your statement is shown above.
I shall not reply to you fuhrer. In view of your rudeness, you have not deserved even this one.
Good hunting!