Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq: The War That Broke Us -- Not
American Thinker ^ | Aug 22, 2010 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 08/22/2010 11:25:17 AM PDT by Rashputin

Aren't these also the same folks who tell us how well JFK and LBJ ran the economy back in the roaring 60s? During the eight years of 1961-69, 46% of all federal spending was on national defense. During President Bush's eight years, defense spending did not even average 20% of federal outlays. Under JFK/LBJ, defense spending was 8-9% of GDP. Under Bush it was about 4%.

How did the economy do so well in the 1960s, and so badly in the 2000s, when less than half as much of our resources were devoted to defense in that more recent term?

The questions are rhetorical. Defense spending, the Iraq War in particular, was not the cause of our economic problems. I don't care if you hear it from James Carville, Ron Paul, or a Nobel Prize-winning economist. It is a lie.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; defense; federalspending; iraq
I know far too many independents who have been brainwashed into thinking that Iraq cost far more and was a far larger percent of spending that it really has been. I'm sending this to them and hope some here will get something out of this article as well.
1 posted on 08/22/2010 11:25:19 AM PDT by Rashputin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

We had a huge manufacturing base then. Try convincing the Free Trade crowd that shipping it overseas was a bad idea.


2 posted on 08/22/2010 11:26:58 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
We had far less entitlenment spending then. In 1960 the federal budget was just under 100 billion dollars, with 50+% on defense. No Medicare, no Great Society, no food stamps, no Model Cities, no Aid to Dependent Children, no Manpower Development and Training Act, the first bleeding wound in the name of "job training."

Yeah times were a lot cheaper then, back when America was free.

3 posted on 08/22/2010 11:36:55 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

I know a lot of people, including FReepers, criticize defense spending as wasteful. By my own thinking, entitlement spending is 5X as wasteful. At least with defense spending, you foster a technically skilled workforce and produce things that can be used to defend the country. That has the side benefit of being a “big stick” to enable our other diplomatic initiatives. It also has the benefit of producing technology with civilian application (like GPS) which helps our competitiveness.

With entitlement spending, you start with dependent clients and get....more dependent clients. And public union employees. How exactly does that help us?

Of course, you could just NOT spend the $$ at all. That might be the best of both worlds. But, if you’re gonna spend Government $$, defense is the way to go.


4 posted on 08/22/2010 11:37:39 AM PDT by rbg81 (When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
We had a huge manufacturing base then.

Bingo, and nothing is going to change until it returns.

5 posted on 08/22/2010 11:44:35 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

What drove manufacturing offshore was not free trade it was our desire for higher wages (cost of product) that drove it offshore.


6 posted on 08/22/2010 11:50:08 AM PDT by ully2 (ully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
...With entitlement spending, you start with dependent clients and get....more dependent clients...

That is exactly right. It's an endless financial black hole of need that would rival anything Stephen Hawkins could conceive. We have bums that have been living in Dallas Section 8 housing for as long as forty years in some cases. Why bother to ever attempt to work your way up provrebial ladder when all you've really have to do is sit there and suck air?

7 posted on 08/22/2010 12:07:00 PM PDT by Free in Texas (When they come for your guns, give 'em your bullets first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ully2
Agree...it's actually a combination of several things, unions driving up wages, environmental laws and regulations, permits, no tort reform, free trade etc.

One thing is for sure, we will not recover from this without producing goods and services using our own resources, can't be done any other way.

8 posted on 08/22/2010 12:07:33 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ully2

Oh, how could I forget to mention the tax structure?


9 posted on 08/22/2010 12:09:09 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (People I know have papers for their mongrels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ully2
Oh, there's plenty of blame to go around. Plenty. Wage inflation is only one of the things that made it impossible for most industries to both compete and manufacture in the US. Having been born and raised in Youngstown, OH, I've read a good bit about the end of manufacturing in this country. The more I read the more I realized that no matter how much unions and wage inflation can be blamed, management that thought they could always just raise prices rather than actually run their businesses have at least as much to answer for. Especially when that same management wasn't even investing enough in their own industry to stay up to date.

Free trade only became a big factor when company managements recognized how badly they had run their businesses, unions recognized that there wasn't going to be any more free ride, and both expected government protection since the government had frequently aided the creation of competitors in foreign nations. That's the way it goes when managers don't manage, it's all fun and games until someone gets hit in the head with a brick. That's why I don't expect GM or Chrysler to make it in the longer run, they avoided getting hit in the head with a brick so for them it's all still fun and games.

Naturally, YMMV and I'm sure many folks think there's a case for a more lopsided allocation of blame.

Regards

10 posted on 08/22/2010 12:18:09 PM PDT by Rashputin (Obama is already insane and sequestered on golf courses or vacations so you won't know it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free in Texas

I know. Saying Entitlement Spending is 5X as wasteful as Defense spending is probably a gross understatment.


11 posted on 08/22/2010 12:22:44 PM PDT by rbg81 (When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
You'd be right at home amongst Canadian liberals & socialists. Conservatives here are, mostly, proponents of free trade. The anti free-trade leftists are also staunchly anti-American — the U.S. is their bogey man. They tell us that free-trade means giving up our sovereignty to American imperialism.

Actually, protectionism is at the root of a lot of the evils that beguile U.S. (and Canadian) manufacturing. With protectionism, the auto industry had no incentive to rein in unions. With protectionism, industries thought they could pass on the costs of environmental, and other regulations to the consumers. Free trade simply returned the economy to free-market principles. Unfortunately, a lot of the damage was already done.

12 posted on 08/22/2010 12:57:06 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

“With entitlement spending, you start with dependent clients and get....more dependent clients. And public union employees. How exactly does that help us?”

Well, to be fair, it looks like some entitlement spending is helping the gambling industry..

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2575512/posts


13 posted on 08/22/2010 12:57:56 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Yeah, keep telling yourself that.


14 posted on 08/22/2010 1:45:59 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

It will end badly.


15 posted on 08/22/2010 2:00:46 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson