Not the same thing, nice try, going on some sodomite's show for an interview is not the same thing as being a keynote speaker at a homo bash. Farah was invited I'm sure only because of this dustup with Coulter, something which seems to be delighting the activist queer community.
All Farah did in the interview was reaffirm his position AGAINST gay marriage, against the practice of homosexuality as a legit lifestyle according to the Bible, reaffirmed his position on the birther issue, called Coulter an outright liar as far as the booking of her on his conference which she has denied, basically said or did nothing in the interview to appease, encourage, excuse, apologize or legitimize sodomitic behavior.
Not sure why he felt the need to go on these shows but he did and not only attacked Coulter because of her apparent embracement of homosexuals, but attacked homosexuality itself as going against the Law of God, now only if Coulter were to be so bold, well we know how she sneers at birtherism, maybe her next tactic is to call Farah a homophobe. Ya think?
...[Joseph Farah] Coulter because of her apparent embracement of homosexuals...I think that this is at the heart of the problem:
Ann truly LIKES many gay people, and THEY really like her.Many social conservatives seem to fear that Ann's close association with them on such a PERSONAL level will eventually effect her on a POLITICAL level.
And, they **could** be right -- if it wasn't ANN we were talking about.But, her very good friend BARBARA OLSON [who died on 9/11 in the hijacked plane that hit the Pentagon]'s widower, TED OLSON, may be an example of what they fear might happen to Ann.
Ted Olson, who recently led the legal battle to get California's pro-"one man, one woman"-marriage Proposition 8 overturned in the courts, seems to have been influenced to support gay marriage by his new (much younger) lefty wife.
Thank you.
The quoted bit from Signorile about Farah saying he realized that Coulter lied??? What was that about?