Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest

“145 years after Appomattox, Grant won’t have to surrender this one either.”

Huh? Grant was never in danger of having to surrender at Appomattox. Trying to be cute by spouting nonsense.

Personally I’m a big fan of Sam Grant, and wouldn’t want to see him replaced. If anything put Reagan on the 10. Grant saved the Union, Hamilton started a bank.


10 posted on 08/26/2010 4:58:10 AM PDT by Hugin (Remember the first rule of gunfighting...have a gun..-- Col. Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin
Huh? Grant was never in danger of having to surrender at Appomattox.

That was my first reaction, but reading it again, her statement is valid.

Grant won’t have to surrender this one either, just like he didn't have to surrender the last one.

28 posted on 08/26/2010 5:50:36 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson