Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals add Hasluck and Brisbane to win column: AEC (Australian election - conservatives lead by 2)
The Australian ^ | 26th August 2010 | James Massola

Posted on 08/26/2010 5:54:08 AM PDT by naturalman1975

THE Coalition has won Hasluck and Brisbane, the latest AEC figures show, taking its likely seat tally to 73.

Labor, which has 71 seats, is still ahead in the Victorian seat of Corangamite, according to an Australian Electoral Commission update a short time ago.

Earlier updates in the Western Australian seat of Hasluck showed Liberal candidate Ken Wyatt, who suffered a slight dip in his lead earlier today, on track to take the seat from incumbent Sharryn Jackson, The Australian reports.

Mr Wyatt had an overnight lead of 765 votes, and official AEC figures show he extended that lead to finish ahead by 820 votes. In Brisbane, former Liberal MP Teresa Gambaro looks to have unseated the ALP member for Brisbane, Arch Bevis, with the AEC showing her 796 votes ahead.

But in the Victorian seat of Corangamite, ALP incumbent Darren Cheeseman increased his lead over Liberal Sarah Henderson twice today, first to 705 votes and to 718 votes, up from an overnight lead of 573 votes.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
The conservative coalition is now in the driving seat - if these numbers are right (and it would be surprising if they are not) we have more seats than Labor - either 73-72 or 74-71 depending on the way the last seat still considered in doubt goes - it's more likely to go to Labor than to us.

There are no guarantees this means we get government. The four independents and the single Green still have to decide who to support - either together or separately - but by tradition and convention, the conservative coalition would now be considered to have the greater right govern - we have more seats.

If Labor had more seats, they'd have the greater right for the same reason. If they had the same number, they'd have the greater right because of being the incumbent.

But barring some unusual development, that's not going to happen.

The independents don't have to go our way (but polling in their electorates show that most of their supporters want them to by a large majority) but it's much harder for them to justify going Labor than it is to justify going coalition - to support the coalition all they have to say is "they won more seats." For Labor, they have to come up with more than that for it to be considered acceptable by most people.

1 posted on 08/26/2010 5:54:11 AM PDT by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

“Liberals add” in the headline kind of threw me for a minute :-)


2 posted on 08/26/2010 5:57:08 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

NOTE TO FReepers:

“Liberal” and “Conservative” are reversed Down Under.............


3 posted on 08/26/2010 5:57:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Yes, I’m sorry we’re so confusing in our labels.


4 posted on 08/26/2010 5:59:25 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Don't be sorry. You guys are right. "Liberal", as per the dictionary, means markets and lifestyles with minimal government involvement.

The word has been perverted in the U.S.

"Labour" (albeit the "u" really is unnecessary) is a much better word to use for those wanting government control of our lives and income without working.

5 posted on 08/26/2010 6:11:54 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

In Australia, it is actually the Labor Party, despite the more correct spelling in Australian English being considered the British labour (both are considered acceptable).

An American (as it turns out - he claimed to be Canadian which at the time allowed him to serve in Australia’s Parliament as both Canadians and Australians were British subjects) named King O’Malley who was a big figure in the early days of the Australian Labour Party, forced the change in spelling as he considered Labor more modern.


6 posted on 08/26/2010 6:24:03 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Even your political labels are upside down. Heheheh.


7 posted on 08/26/2010 6:35:14 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
An American (as it turns out - he claimed to be Canadian which at the time allowed him to serve in Australia’s Parliament as both Canadians and Australians were British subjects) named King O’Malley who was a big figure in the early days of the Australian Labour Party, forced the change in spelling as he considered Labor more modern.

Now, that's something I've never known. Anyway, our sincere apologies to our contribution to your Labor Party.

8 posted on 08/26/2010 6:36:21 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Wasn’t there a poll done in the last day or so that showed the constituents of most of the independents wanted them to work with the Coalition rather than Labor?


9 posted on 08/26/2010 6:39:45 AM PDT by Heatseeker (Elizabeth Cheney for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Heatseeker

Yes - 55% to 33%.

They’ve got to be thinking about that.


10 posted on 08/26/2010 6:41:51 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
What is the status of all the ‘carbon credit’ emission trading in Oz? Has the election done away with that BS or not?
11 posted on 08/26/2010 7:39:38 AM PDT by JPG (How much taxpayer $ did Mookie blow today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JPG
The conservative coalition rejected it under their current leader, Tony Abbott, in December last year. Labor under previous leader (and former Prime Minister) Kevin Rudd then shelved their plans until after this election because they realised they could not get it through the Senate (as in the US, both Houses need to pass a Bill for it to become law).

A lot of people claim this decision is what lead to Kevin Rudd becoming unpopular - he was elected partly on this policy, which he described as needed to address the greatest moral challenge of this time, so when he backed down, he not only broke an election promise, he made it clear he wasn't even willing to fight for things he regarded as extremely important - even those who didn't want carbon trading held it against him, because you don't want a weak Prime Minister who throws in the towel when things get hard.

What's going to happen now is anybody's guess really - if reelected Julia Gillard may bring it back - she should based on what she's said in the past, but this close an election gives coverage to change plans. Tony Abbott wouldn't want to bring it back - but the Greens hold the balance of power in the Senate now, and also have representation in the House of Representatives for the first time - it's a deal that may have to be made to get other legislation through. We just don't know.

12 posted on 08/26/2010 4:14:35 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Thanks for that info. I hope for Australia's sake it doesn't ever pass as it would be a guaranteed economy killer with next to nothing in tangible benefits.
13 posted on 08/26/2010 4:22:23 PM PDT by JPG (How much taxpayer $ did Mookie blow today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson