Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

History refresher- Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
Human Events ^ | 08/16/2006 | Frances Rice

Posted on 08/29/2010 2:16:46 PM PDT by NoLibZone

It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S's: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.

During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman's issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.

Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.

In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King's leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a "trouble-maker" who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.

Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon's 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation's fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.

Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.

Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.

Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King's protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as "that Nigger preacher."

Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist "Dixiecrats" did not all migrate to the Republican Party. "Dixiecrats" declared that they would rather vote for a "yellow dog" than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those "Dixiecrats" continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.

Another former "Dixiecrat" is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been "a great senator for any moment," including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.

The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.

Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.

After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).

Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.

In order to break the Democrats' stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party's economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.

Ms. Rice is chairman of the National Black Republican Association (NBRA) and may be contacted at www.NBRA.info.


TOPICS: Extended News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: drking; martinlutherking; mlk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: BillyBoy

” Senator Ev Dirksen (R-IL) was a conservative Republican”

I remember Everett Dirksen and his odes to marigolds. Dirksen was considered a moderate in his time.


41 posted on 08/31/2010 9:49:09 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

“Btw...I was alive then and don’t remember King like Beck who is 8 years my junior does.”

I was a teenager living in greater Washington DC when King made his famous speech. Beck’s version of King has very little in common with the real man. King was many things, but conservative wasn’t remotely one of them. He routinely praised socialism and he kept a couple of Communist Party members as advisors.


42 posted on 08/31/2010 9:58:02 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

“If this is our future on the right...God help us.

What’s next?”

I know! I know!

A Mondale speech writer, a man who tried to help him defeat Ronald Reagan, will be hailed as a “conservative”!

No, wait.. that’s already happened. His name is Charles Krauthammer.


43 posted on 08/31/2010 10:01:47 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

crazy isn’t it?

check my posting history to see the heat I get for pointing out what you and I say


44 posted on 08/31/2010 10:02:20 PM PDT by wardaddy (effed up times..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

no kidding ...a New Republic writer like Barnes and Kondracke


45 posted on 08/31/2010 10:04:36 PM PDT by wardaddy (effed up times..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Yeah, apparently if we live long enough we will get to see Barack Obama hailed as a great American conservative.


46 posted on 08/31/2010 10:04:36 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Yeah, there’s two prizes. What’s funny, in a pathetic way, is how much the current incarnation of National Review resembles The New Republic of the 1980s.


47 posted on 08/31/2010 10:09:34 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

When Johnson got the war on poverty program, he reportedly said, Those _ _ _ _ _ _ s(starts with N) will be voting Democrat for the next 30 years.

He was vile in the way he spoke.


48 posted on 08/31/2010 10:16:46 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Excellent. Someone (other than dear old mom) knows the truth about MLK.


49 posted on 08/31/2010 10:26:03 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
[LBJ] was vile in the way he spoke.

He was vile in the way he thought. And acted, as well.

Indeed, he was a vile man.

As personally corrupt, perhaps, as Billy Jeff Clinton.

50 posted on 08/31/2010 10:31:22 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Yep, reading what he wrote should cure the myth. Although some of us remember him and already knew the myth was ridiculous.


51 posted on 08/31/2010 10:36:38 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Absolutely, corrupt, and willing to do anything, which is why so many people thought at the time that He was behind the Kennedy assassination.
52 posted on 08/31/2010 10:39:33 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Ha. Lyndon Johnson had Slick Willy beat in spades when it comes to sleazy behavior. Johnson didn’t even bother to hide his women from his wife, he just expected her to accept it. Which she did. And the Clintons only dreamt of enriching themselves to the degree that LBJ managed when he held office.


53 posted on 08/31/2010 10:43:05 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Well, I guess if you look at Bush & McCain's immigration record, maybe JFK is like "today's Republicans" after all.

Snap!

54 posted on 08/31/2010 11:05:00 PM PDT by Impy (DROP. OUT. MARK. KIRK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

“When Johnson got the war on poverty program, he reportedly said, Those _ _ _ _ _ _ s(starts with N) will be voting Democrat for the next 30 years.”

-

Is there a source for that?

This is exactly the sort of thing, our side needs to “Saul Alinsky”.

If true, repeat it on signs, and at every opportunity.


55 posted on 08/31/2010 11:14:12 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (posting handle made more sense, back before CNN became obama's shoe-shine stand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I can’t remember the source. I know I felt it was credible enough at the time, that I didn’t question it. It was at least 15 years ago. I just can’t remember stuff like I used to . Sorry. If I happen to remember or run across some info again, I’ll post it.


56 posted on 08/31/2010 11:49:23 PM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson