Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ancient Drive

Or even better - simply allow the Hawaii Dept of Health to obey its Administrative Rules and send a non-certified copy of the genuine COLB to anybody who asks for it.

It is a full-out lie that Fukino has been saying - that nothing from his BC can be revealed to the public. She can and must reveal the real COLB to anybody who asks for it. She doesn’t want to do that because anything she prints out has to show the legal status of the certificate, and Obama’s is amended and late - 2 reasons why it has NO LEGAL VALUE.

Fukino has been feeding us a bunch of crap since the beginning, beginning with illegally concealing the HDOH Administrative Rules which reveal that anybody is supposed to be able to get Obama’s non-certified COLB - concealment which is not only a violation of Hawaii law but in this context a federal crime, violating 18 USC 1001 - the Federal General False Statement Act.

The Hawaii Ombudsman’s Office has agreed with me that Fukino lied when she told me that the law FORBIDS her from disclosing Obama’s non-certified COLB. The Ombudsman correctly noted that the Rules ALLOW her to disclose it. What he refused to do was go the next step and say that because the laws and rules allow disclosure, UIPA DEMANDS disclosure.

The Hawaii bureaucrats all know that the rules and laws are being broken. When the people of the US get sick of this crap enough to tell them to put their lawlessness where the sun don’t shine, MAYBE we will see the rule of law. I guarantee we won’t see it one second before that.


42 posted on 08/29/2010 8:41:30 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

“concealment which is not only a violation of Hawaii law but in this context a federal crime, violating 18 USC 1001 - the Federal General False Statement Act.”

I’m no lawyer, but it would surprise me greatly if a federal statute governed the behavior of a state official while in office. This would appear to pose rather severe separation-of-powers questions. After all, if the federal can penalize (and perhaps imprison?) a state official for how they conduct their duties, what’s to prevent them from passing a law to heavily fine or imprison any governor who refuses to remit 50% of all state tax collections to Uncle Sam?


174 posted on 08/30/2010 4:22:02 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson