Replies

Again, you are reading reactively. You have never responded to what I actually wrote. You have always responded to something I did not write. This will be immediately obvious to virtually anyone else who reads my posts to which you responded. The only thing I can surmise is that a. you are obstinate or b. you have a problem reading. There is hope for b. There isn't much hope for a. as long as you continue to mischaracterize for personal reasons of your own (see bold text below) what other Freepers say. Anyone who has read anything I've written over the past 12 years will know how specious is your slander below referencing what Jim said as though, in any way, it applied to me. You're about as far off the mark as it is possible to be.

FR is a conservative site. We do not appreciate our members fighting against us on our conservative values and issues. If you wish to support homosexual marriage or homosexuals in the military or hate crimes against us for speaking out against government promotion of homosexuality that’s your business, but you’d better do it somewhere else and not on FR. If you value your posting privileges, that is. FR is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-marriage, pro-military, pro-traditional American conservatism and it is a privilege to post here. Those who support the godless liberal/Marxist destruction of our free society and our country are free to exercise their free speech rights elsewhere. I won’t stand in your way.

It seems not to have occurred to you to review your own posting to see how such a misunderstanding by so many could possibly have come about. Either defend what you believe, or sharpen up your beliefs with the help of others here, but lay off attacking others for questioning the utility of your off-point theorizing couched in supercilious tones.

Your Post 104

The more likely scenario is that there is an inborn predisposition to heterosexuality that, for various reasons, genetic, biological, psychological, and cultural may be weakened or suppressed.

You are excusing behavior that is rooted in mental illness by suggesting it may be "genetic or biological". There is NO proof that the behavior is genetic or biological. None.

Born or Bred?: Science Does Not Support the Claim That Homosexuality Is Genetic

In his book Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, Dr. Jeffrey Satinover writes:

We will see later the falsity of activists' repeated assertions that homosexuality is immutable. They seek to create the impression that science has settled these questions, but it most certainly has not. Instead, the changes that have occurred in both public and professional opinion have resulted from politics, pressure, and public relations.