Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scythian

I won’t watch the video and can’t even bring myself to finish the article, but why the hell didn’t the videographer put down the damn camera and help these dogs?

This happens all the time - the “outraged” observer is always too concerned with getting the act on video, instead of stopping the horror that is occurring.


3 posted on 08/31/2010 7:58:37 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Joann37

The video recorder wasn’t out-raged, they acted like this was as normal as playing scrabble. Sick, I agree. I watched to see if it might be fake, sadly, it is not.


8 posted on 08/31/2010 8:00:17 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

Mike Wallace and Peter Jennings admitted at a roundtable media forum (you can see the video on youtube) that they would stand by and let US troops get killed and “report the story” even if they had foreknowledge of an enemy attack.

“Must remain impartial” and such bullstalin. We know they sure as hell are NOT impartial when it comes to politics.

Then again Peter Jennings was a Canadian citizen and only “became an American” near the end of his life where he STILl boasted of retaining his Canadian citizenship. The only reasons I can think are so that he could vote against Bush in 2004 and maybe for his will.


10 posted on 08/31/2010 8:02:38 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

I watched until one of the pups started to cry.
Special place in hell for this chick.


14 posted on 08/31/2010 8:04:35 AM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37

“This happens all the time - the “outraged” observer is always too concerned with getting the act on video, instead of stopping the horror that is occurring.”

Yeah, this dimwit was watching the dogs go over while thinking “this is going to go viral.”


19 posted on 08/31/2010 8:07:13 AM PDT by jessduntno (Flush the Grand Old Potty. Vote Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
"I won’t watch the video and can’t even bring myself to finish the article, but why the hell didn’t the videographer put down the damn camera and help these dogs?"

I won't watch it either.

The videographer wouldn't put down the camera to help because this was probably shot purposefully for YouTube. People are doing more and more bizarre things to get attention on YouTube.

31 posted on 08/31/2010 8:16:50 AM PDT by Spunky (You are free to make choices, but not free from the consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Joann37
I won’t watch the video and can’t even bring myself to finish the article, but why the hell didn’t the videographer put down the damn camera and help these dogs?

It was a passive security camera...

45 posted on 08/31/2010 8:38:00 AM PDT by GOPJ (TIME Magazine - - a conserve-a-phobe publication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson