Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/31/2010 1:59:30 PM PDT by jeffq73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jeffq73
...Yoest called the decision by the Department of Justice to appeal an injunction of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research “not surprising, but not the biggest story here.”

I agree. Any _resident that willfully signs an executive order that violates the law should be impeached. There is nothing to appeal.

2 posted on 08/31/2010 2:03:16 PM PDT by scott7278 ("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked." BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jeffq73

I think the following story is the “big one”. It speaks to true, pure evil. If Obama supports killing living children outside the womb, the heck with embryos.

On March 30, 2001, Obama was the ONLY Illinois senator who rose to speak against a bill that would have protected babies who survived late term labor-induced abortion. Obama rose to object that if the bill passed, and a nine-month-old fetus survived a late-term labor-induced abortion was deemed to be a person who had a right to live, then the law would “forbid abortions to take place.” Obama further explained the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not allow somebody to kill a child, so if the law deemed a child who survived a late-term labor-induced abortion had a right to live, “then this would be an anti-abortion statute.”


3 posted on 08/31/2010 2:40:45 PM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson