Why did she jump to the conclusion about impeachment, his suit is NOT about impeachment, it is about eligibility.
She’s more concerned with any “embarrassment” Dear Reader might feel than with upholding the Constitution.
This woman “judge” is Obama’s dancing bear.
He isn’t suing, he’s fighting a criminal conviction for disobeying orders. He’s being denied evidence to justify his stance because it might embarrass someone. So this guy should spend time in JAIL, MILITARY JAIL to avoid “embarrassing” someone.
I am having trouble understanding how even those who laugh at us ‘birthers’ could deny that this is getting ridiculous.
...not about impeachment, about eligibility...
Yes, but the only remedy at this point for ineligibility is impeachment. Catch 22. He was certified by the electoral college and sworn in by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and he is POTUS whether he was eligible or not. The fact that he is POTUS means he was eligible. It may be maddening to you, but that is the law and the only legal remedy is impeachment where you will not find 67 Senators to vote for removal.