To: 2nd amendment mama
Sigh. This stuff has been all over. He was told to take the LaRouche sign down. Evidently there’s a “no advertizing” rule. He went crazy. Should have done his impeachment sign without the pushing of the nut, probably.
Of course, there’s enough nuts who will probably loop this thing at least 26 times on here.
23 posted on
09/02/2010 8:28:59 PM PDT by
Hardraade
(I want gigaton warheads now!!)
To: Hardraade
Would you be a vendor at any function if you could not advertise? To advertise would seem to indicate promotion of a product or an event not a political idea.
32 posted on
09/02/2010 8:45:24 PM PDT by
em2vn
To: Hardraade
there’s enough nuts
And fascists who think the guy had absolutely NO right to protest. So where do you stand?
43 posted on
09/02/2010 9:19:51 PM PDT by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: Hardraade
“Evidently there’s a “no advertizing” rule.”
Political speech is not advertising. It is, however, a God-given right.
59 posted on
09/02/2010 10:01:24 PM PDT by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson