Posted on 09/03/2010 5:39:48 AM PDT by blueyon
This next statement has got to be a joke!
She said opening up such evidence could be an "embarrassment" to the president, and it's up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president.
I am completely aghast. One has nothing to do with the other. Either he qualifies as POTUS and his orders are legal or he doesn't which makes his orders illegal. Equating the two as the same thing isn't her responsibility.
Some day she may be embareassed for making such a stupid statement.
“Lind also says that authority stops with the Pentagon. So if the Pentagon accepts a usurper everyone else has to accept the usurper too, regardless of The Constitution.”
So, let me get this straight. The “Pentagon” is the Commander in Chief not the President?
How in the world have we sunk so low to have judges like this?
(hanging head and silently weeping..........)
No lower court judge is going to expose the evidence because they know that BO has the legal authority to challenge any thing they order. These judge have no authority to remove him from office. (Think of the chaos that would ensue nationaly and internationally between time of a lower court decision and the final outcome from the SCOTUS, if the court lower court ruled against BO)
OTOH the judge may fill his orders with all sorts of “garbage” giving the plaintiff grounds to appeal the decision to the SCOTUS.
The military court is a branch of the federal court system.
It's final decision is with the SCOTUS.
The only Court that has the authority to make a decision not be appealed and order his removal is the SCOTUS. The two new members will be ordered to recluse themselves by the Chief Justice. They will NOT have a choice. So the final decision will be a seven member panel...My guess 7-0 if the material they request is delivered finds him not eligible..
Why would the SCOTUS see this case and not the others that they had a chance to rule on his eligibility?
One named the SOS from various states as the defendant. There is no where in their job description that they have been given power or authority to verify the eligibility of POTUS. That being said, they may be taken off the table and opinion can be rendered at any time.
One named the SOS from states as the defendant. There is no where in their job description that they have been given power or authority to verify the eligibilty of POTUS. That being said, the cases tabled may be taken off the table and opinion can be rendered at any time.
The other cases were tabled. BUT they also had the wrong premise, wrong plaintiffs and wrong defendants.
One named the SOS from states as the defendant. There is no where in their job description that they have been given power or authority to verify the eligibilty of POTUS. That being said, the cases tabled may be taken off the table and opinion can be rendered at any time.
Eight appeals challenging Obama’s eligibility have submitted Petitions for Writs of Certiorari. All eight have been denied, not tabled by the Supreme Court meaning they did not get the required four justices to agree to hear the appeal before the full court. Those eight denied appeals are: Berg v Obama, Beverly v FEC, Craig v US, Donofrio v Wells, Herbert v Obama, Lightfoot v Bowen, Schneller v Cortes and Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz.
When an appeal is denied, it’s dead.
Land, with all due respect, doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about.
The whole “I was just doing my job” defense went out at Nuremburg.
Since that time, it is agreed and admitted that actions of soldiers must be lawful, IN EVERY RESPECT. And that includes having no doubts at all that his commander is exercising lawful authority.
If he follows the commands of his boss, but has doubts about whether or not his boss can/should do that, he is basically committing a crime.
Obama did not issue an order to Lakin. His brigade commander and two other superior officers did.
and the fact that Lakin didn't get the order directly from obama.
The day of the GOre/Bush election my father who practiced law for over fifty years, has JAG experience, was first in his law class and had clerked in the federal court system gave a piece of paper to a local judge telling him what the chapter and paragraph were that the cases would be settled on and which jurist would vote for and against. He was 100 per cent correct.
Basically I’ve repeated what he’s telling me. I trust his judgment.
The standard set at Nuerenburg was that you could not obey an order that required the commitment of a crime. So, are you saying that obeying a deployment order to Afghanistan constitutes a crime? I think not.
Also, officers cannot disobey orders at will. If they fail to obey, they do so at their own peril. If the order that they disobeyed is found to be legal, then they will pay the price. LTC Lakin is about to learn what the word peril means.
The day of the GOre/Bush election my father who practiced law for over fifty years, has JAG experience, was first in his law class and had clerked in the federal court system gave a piece of paper to a local judge telling him what the chapter and paragraph were that the cases would be settled on and which jurist would vote for and against. He was 100 per cent correct.
Basically I’ve repeated what he’s telling me. I trust his judgment.
When it is the POTUS, it isn’t fraud. it is treason.
We have a proper punishment.
But - as with most liars - it starts small, then builds and builds. Right now - we are at a popint where - we don’t know who is father is, question where he was born, how h got into school test scores, grades, etc. He claims to be an author - but has no history of passion for writing - no failures, no writing when given prime opportunity - a la harvard Law.
He lets his handlers present him as genius - but any test score would establish it. He tells us he is a Christian - yet took a Muslim name, and has actively promoted Muslim agenda for decades.
I don’t think every piece of data on his background could be that damning. I think he is just a paranoid narcisist, brought on by being abandoned by his parents - 2 dads and a mom, while having his head full of wacko mush.
He is protected by his skin color - which is why he retreats to that defense every time. it is his magic cloak.
The reality is - he is a liar, and is frightened now that any string gets pulled, the whole house of cards will come down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.