Bah - The primary concern for the world would be the continuation of the NK regime, not the failure of it.
Of course, success and good things in general have a price but the free world is resilient enough to absorb and correct the problems arising from the collapse of another fascist regime.
Far worse would be the endless continuation of a dangerous, unpredictable, isolated communist state that has actively spread nuclear weapons and tech around the world.
Help the damn thing die already.
I never expected that Cheonan incident would send such a shockwave into world financial market. Financial Times was so freaked out that it pulled out well-known N. Korea specialist to write a column for 'pleading against war.' I thought that only pinko losers in S. Korea freak out so fast. Now I know likes of Goldman Sachs can breathe fire to U.S. gov but is scared to death about likes of Chia Head. This is truly deplorable development, but it is unfortunately true.
Still I don't mind Goldman Sachs crash, whatever the collateral damage is. We are just holding off the big crash, and the N. Korean disaster would only bring on the inevitable. It is not as if N. Korea would single-handedly create the crash.
I want the N. Korean regime to go down as well as this sick parade of artificially propped up market thanks to losers such as Bernanke and Krugman.
N. Korea collapse can result in long-awaited resolution in a messy way, because we have not properly anticipate and prepare for it. Many countries let world finance out of control and also failed to step in more resolutely to resolve N. Korean nuclear problem.