[BelegStrongbow]

Brilliant article. Nails the argument, proving that the Islamic Scripture encourages 10 times more violence than the Hebrew Bible and that the New Testament has no violence proclaimed or encouraged at all (excepting the violence done to those proclaiming the gospel, of course, and that doesn’t count in this context). Islam is a permanent threat to world peace in general and anyone who is neither an adherent or a subject in particular.

They call it jihad. Don’t we call it Crusade?

[t-dude]

"They call it jihad. Don’t we call it Crusade?"

What an ignorant statement. You need to educate yourself a little, maybe read the frickin' article... that would be a start...

[t-dude]

*

[muawiyah]

No, Jihad and Crusade are totally different concepts. As any Hindu can tell you Jihad is a situation where the folks down the street can be Moslems and may well have lived in peace with their neighbors for generations. Then, one day, they just jump up and burn out the neighborhood to kill the Hindus.

I'd say they were exaggerating what happens in India except they're not ~ MILLIONS DIED in the twentieth century just that way.

Or, in its counterpart ~ the Hindus jump up someday and go burnout the Moslems.

The Crusades did not happen in that manner ~