Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA

Of course.

For the first time in a long time, people are buying at replacement levels only. Many have severely adjusted their standard of when they “need” a new, or a different vehicle.

Same with houses, only even more so. There is NO intrinsic demand to BUY houses. There are almost no cases in which a person/family could not rent, rather than buy, if they “had” to for some reason. So people are also buying homes mostly at replacement value — which means largely a return to the days when a family bought one or maybe two homes in a lifetime. They did not sell their old home and buy a new one to move across town or to get a mud room, a larger yard or whatever.


16 posted on 09/09/2010 4:53:41 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Step away from the toilet. Let the housing market flush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG

A brief look at edmunds.com a few days ago gave me the idea that the large car companies really didn’t want to sell cars. it was kind of this is our price take it or leave it - oh hum.IMHO

I have two drivers one with 250K and one with 167K miles so I was looking.


24 posted on 09/09/2010 5:04:03 PM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

That’s what we are doing. We bought new SUVs during the past couple of years, and we are gonna pay them off, then drive them until they literally fall apart. No ‘new’ cars for us. Trading in every couple or so years has to be one of the biggest wastes of money there is!


31 posted on 09/09/2010 5:19:46 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson