Whoo, this is a doozie. I wonder if I could get an “honorary membership” in the Log Cabin Republicans? Probably not. I think that even the Ninth Circus might rip this one apart. Its not only poorly reasoned, its poorly written. I wonder how the left found this judge and how did they get this case in front of her? Inquiring minds want to know.
Of course, since the 9th will review, it could be affirmed and then it would be off to the SCOTUS. Doesn’t stand a chance there.
So is this judge going to rewrite the UCMJ?