[TexasFreeper2009]

Every time some liberal says they are against “tax cuts for the rich” we need to say... you mean you are against tax cuts for employers? because that's who the rich are, the people that EMPLOY people! So when you oppose tax cuts for employers, what you are really saying is, that you are happy with the current unemployment rate. Because contrary to liberal opinion the vast majority of the rich are not like Paris Hilton or John Kerry living off the wealth of their productive parents or rich wives fortunes, they are the business owners who employ people.

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

Paris Hilton earns lots of her own money....is just that she earns a lot of money from easy work with virtually no risk.

For instance, an LA millionaire once paid Paris $250,000 just to show up at his daughter’s sweet 16 party in order to impress the daughter’s friends.

On New Year’s Eve one year, Paris received $2 million for cutting the ribbon on a new brewery that opened in Australia.

But like you say....most of the “rich” are hardworking business owners who put in long hours and risk their own money. I like your idea of having the GOP call the “rich” employers instead of the “rich.” The Republicans should also point out that small business employ 75% of all Americans. To find out who these working “rich” really are, the libs should read the book “The Millionaire Next Door.”

[CAluvdubya]

I totally agree!

[for-q-clinton]

Better yet, just agree with them and change the dialog to tax cuts for employers.

Just like the rats did by going with progressive...we’ll just change the words we use to describe what we want.

We are against tax cuts for the Rich who will just stash the money away, but are for tax cuts for those hard working american’s who own a business and employee others.