>>> and you would rather see someone who will lord over us with their support for a liberal/socialistic agenda?
And nominating an unelectable conservative over a moderate Republican, thereby ensuring the election of a blue state liberal democrat to the US Senate and quite possibly killing a Republican take-over of the Senate will certainly impede “a liberal/socialistic agenda”.
Why didn’t I see this before.
“Why didn’t I see this before.”
Because you didn’t think it through...
Two options, assuming Republicans take the House:
1) Republicans win Senate: House and Senate pass conservative-leaning legislation...POTUS vetoes everything. Gridlock...(POTUS yaps away at all Republicans who aren’t ‘bipartisan’ like Mike Castle)
2) Republicans fail to gain control of Senate: House passes conservative-leaning legislation; divided Senate rejects. Gridlock...POTUS twiddles his thumbs waiting for something to sign.
Thus, at best Mike Castle is irrelevant here, and at worst he would be used as a (willing?) pawn by the administration to criticize all those ‘obstructionist’ Republicans. And do you doubt me on this latter claim?? Well, he hasn’t exactly been cordial to his Conservative challenger now, has he...?
These current times are much different than past elections. we are in a fight right now that is much larger than a potential 1 seat “take over” of a Senate. Many of us (those that are out there in the trenches making a “take over” even a possibility), see this fight as one of “BELIEFS” over Party!
The people leading the charge throughout the country, enabling Republican gains and potential control, are NOT THE GOP IN WASHINGTON and NOT the supporters of RINOs like Castle!