Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican

Um, we already have a qualified, honest, responsible conservative to run. Her name is Christine O’Donnell.


17 posted on 09/13/2010 12:00:36 PM PDT by MarkLevinFan (Thank me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: MarkLevinFan

That’s a good one right there.

Christine O’Donnell is a shameless liar (pretended to be studying for a master’s degree at Princeton when she hadn’t even graduated from college, claimed to have carried two counties against Biden when she carried zero), runs through (other people’s) money like it’s going out of style, doesn’t pay her debts (except when she uses campaign contributions to pay back rent on her apartment), sued a conservative group for $6.9 million because they demoted her from her $30,000-a-year job after finding out that she lied about her credentials, has no business, military or legislative experience, hasn’t held a steady job in years . . . it is risible to compare Christine O’Donnell on issues of qualifications, honesty or responsibility to any of the grassroots conservatives who will be elected to the U.S. Senate this year. Check out the résumés of Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio, Joe Miller, Ron Johnson, Ken Buck . . . heck, even the much-maligned Sharon Angle is a superstar next to O’Donnell. O’Donnell is a gadfly and con artist, while the others are serious candidates with actual qualifications for office.

Just because she’s conservative and cute is no reason to ignore all of the reasons why she cannot possibly be elected to the U.S. Senate in Delaware.

But if you think that sending a message to RINOs (whom, I assure you, you do not detest any more than I do) and getting a Democrat elected as a direct result (not merely “taking a chance” and “placing the seat at risk”; it would be taking a 95% probability of winning the seat and turning it into a 9.99% probability of losing the seat) is more important than winning control of the U.S. Senate and stopping Obama’s agenda, then by all means vote for O’Donnell. Just keep in mind that Coons is 50 and Castle is 71, and that it will be a lot easier for a conservative to defeat Castle in the 2014 primary than to defeat Coons in the general election.


25 posted on 09/13/2010 12:34:09 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: MarkLevinFan

If I were in Delaware, I’d vote for her over a rino any day. What is sad is to watch our own republican party bosses smearing a conservative woman with the typical democrat ‘nut and slut’ campaign. Pathetic!


38 posted on 09/13/2010 4:39:46 PM PDT by penelopesire (NEVER FORGET!! 'You are either with us or you are with the terrorists')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson