To: TigersEye
The requirements sound like the result of good lobbying efforts by the funeral industry though. I was thinking along those lines. Seems like a lot of work to dump a single body into ocean. I'm thinking it would be nothing but bones in less than a week. Wonder what they worry about?
16 posted on
09/15/2010 12:15:35 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(It's easy being a communist when you're rich.)
To: VeniVidiVici
They worry about cases like this one - where because it (apparently) wasn’t done properly, all sorts of resources have been tied up dealing with it.
It can also cost ordinary people, not just the authorities - a fishing boat captain doesn’t appreciate having the entire catch condemned because a body floated into it because somebody else was careless.
17 posted on
09/15/2010 12:23:39 AM PDT by
naturalman1975
("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
To: VeniVidiVici
Exactly. If properly weighted it would. But they want you to buy a $10k corrosion resistant casket and stainless steel chains that will last for decades down there.
20 posted on
09/15/2010 12:35:14 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
To: VeniVidiVici; TigersEye
29 posted on
09/15/2010 2:44:27 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson