Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good Intentions Gone Haywire (racial quotas in financial "reform" bill)
Forbes ^ | September 9, 2010 | Mallory Factor

Posted on 09/15/2010 10:26:22 AM PDT by reaganaut1

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act is supposed to shield consumers from problems in the financial services sector that many believe led to the financial meltdown. But Section 342 of the act introduces a brash example of social engineering that masquerades as consumer protection and financial reform. This section imposes gender and racial employment quotas on the financial services industry, which accounts for one-tenth of our economy. The quota provisions will affect over 50,000 financial services firms and other businesses, and the consequences will be enormous.

Dodd-Frank requires at least 29 federal bureaus to open Offices of Minority & Women Inclusion, involving ten branches of the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and its 12 regional banks, the Securities & Exchange Commission and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The new diversity offices will implement rules to ensure "the fair inclusion and utilization" of minorities and women in all firms doing business with each agency. The offices will terminate contracts with any service provider that fails to meet these as yet undetermined standards. Just running these offices is estimated to cost over $58 million annually, says David Patten in a recent story on Newsmax.com.

These new offices will also assess the "diversity policies and practices" at all entities that fall under their regulatory eye, including banks, broker-dealers, registered investment advisors and now hedge funds. Along with more than 40,000 financial services firms, another 10,000-plus businesses, including accounting and law firms that do business with these government offices, will be subject to this new diversity oversight of their hiring.

What does this mean for the financial services sector? Assuming each firm hires at least one new worker to satisfy the new law, this provision could raise costs $4 billion or more annually, depending how far forthcoming regulations will extend.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: racialquotas
Good intentions my foot. De-facto racial quotas in mortgage lending helped get us in this mess, and the "reform" bill has MORE quotas.
1 posted on 09/15/2010 10:26:25 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The real intention of the bill is to grow the government......using bad seeds and poor fertilizer.................


2 posted on 09/15/2010 10:31:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

bump


3 posted on 09/15/2010 10:31:56 AM PDT by Taffini ( Mr. Pippen and Mr. Waffles do not approve and neither do I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Social Engineering is the Progressives life style. Plantation politics is the unifying idea.


4 posted on 09/15/2010 10:36:40 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Report: "...This section imposes gender and racial employment quotas on the financial services industry, which accounts for one-tenth of our economy. The quota provisions will affect over 50,000 financial services firms and other businesses, and the consequences will be enormous..."

Response: Of course. We are in a process where those that were once excluded from our nations social and political life are now assuming control. Naturally they will pass laws protecting themselves.

5 posted on 09/15/2010 10:38:40 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

10,000 law & accounting firms???

NUTS !!!

EVERY CPA who prepares a tax return- personal 1040 or corp or partnership, etc, is ‘doing business with the Federal Government”.

This will apply to EVERY CPA before NObama is done sticking his nose into the tent.


6 posted on 09/15/2010 10:41:00 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Affirmative action hiring under a different name.

Glad I am self-employed & not ever hiring anyone else.


7 posted on 09/15/2010 10:42:10 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Just remember:

NO-vember.................


8 posted on 09/15/2010 10:44:08 AM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Whats the 3rd and 4th question on any government application that you have to fill out? 1 and 2 is name and address.

Sex and race.

9 posted on 09/15/2010 10:49:04 AM PDT by dancusa (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Financial reform: paid for by America’s taxpayers with the stated goal to help America’s citizens and businesses, but in reality only helping Obama’s select citizens and businesses and screwing the taxpayers. Tips.


10 posted on 09/15/2010 10:53:25 AM PDT by TypicalWhiteAdolescent (The code of competence is the only system of morality that is on a gold standard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
According to our own government (http://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/main.htm) in 2009 "Women comprised 46.8 percent of the total U.S. labor force". How can women still be regarded as any sort of minority needing special treatment?
11 posted on 09/15/2010 10:57:56 AM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
How can women still be regarded as any sort of minority needing special treatment?

Easy. The numbers have nothing to do with it.

We need to get away from this notion (dating back at least to Woodrow Wilson) that government has any obligation to fix what's supposedly "wrong" with the people. This is what is behind all nanny-state regulations, including these.

12 posted on 09/15/2010 1:16:38 PM PDT by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I’m sure Joseph Mengele thought he had good intentions as well - improving the human race!


13 posted on 09/15/2010 1:31:06 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My wife was raised in South Africa and she lived there for almost 30 years.

Her observation: it’s apartheid. With a nicer gloss, certainly, and a more pleasant appearance. But still apartheid.


14 posted on 09/15/2010 3:42:00 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson