Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mysterious Shadow: Code Name Obama [18.12.2008 : From The Pravda]
Pravda ^ | SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 | Mark S. McGrew

Posted on 09/17/2010 3:20:13 AM PDT by RobinMasters

This document alone raises a big question. It is his registration in the State of Illinois for his license to practice Law. The document has a space to list any other names that have been used. Even though he has used other names, this shows, “None”. The other names he has used, that we currently know are: Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham.

During the Presidential debates with Senator John McCain, Obama never once addressed his opponent as “Senator McCain” or “Mr. McCain”. Most people, who have any common courtesy at all, when speaking to their elders, or a senator, would address that person with some degree of respect and use his proper title. Senator McCain has more experience than Obama, is older, has risked his life for his country and does address other people, whatever their position, with respect. Obama, with a look of contempt, addressed Senator McCain as “John this” or “John that”. Not once did he show any basic courtesy or manners to a war veteran, a 25 year member of the United States Senate, a man 25 years his senior. John McCain was a Senator before Obama even knew what name to call himself.

(Excerpt) Read more at english.pravda.ru ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: certifigate; eligibility; foreigninterests; naturalborncitizen; pravda
So much was already known when Obama was elected and look who published it.
1 posted on 09/17/2010 3:20:17 AM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Obama never once addressed his opponent as “Senator McCain” or “Mr. McCain”

Maybe because he, like most, saw through McLame and realized he was a another D.C. dirtbag... just sayin...

2 posted on 09/17/2010 3:31:31 AM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

The American Media is put to shame by Pravda. This is the proof of how low they go. When Pravda is more truthful than the NYT we are in trouble.


3 posted on 09/17/2010 3:31:46 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet

Uh... yeah, strike that annoying “a”... as AOV chugs more java...


4 posted on 09/17/2010 3:33:09 AM PDT by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2061512/posts


5 posted on 09/17/2010 3:47:15 AM PDT by smokingfrog (freerepublic.com - Thanks JimRob! The flags are back! - 8/17/2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

When Pravda agrees with your thesis go with Pravda, when Pravda doesn’t go with China’s state paper.


6 posted on 09/17/2010 4:01:00 AM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

More accurate than the NYT.


7 posted on 09/17/2010 4:03:11 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (counter revolutionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
In this photograph, we see Obama refusing to Salute the American flag and say the pledge of Allegiance as everyone else on the stage was doing.

People sure have a lot of trouble getting the facts straight on this one. Even Pravda. It is the National Anthem, not the Pledge. And, as much as I despise BHO and although he does not have his hand over his heart, I will at least have to credit him with singing, or at least lip synching, some of the words. Watch the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwog6E08CFU&feature=player_embedded

He is clearly mouthing the words starting with "Oh, say does..." at about 28 seconds until the camera moves away from him at about 33 seconds.

8 posted on 09/17/2010 4:42:28 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is <strike>fading</strike>gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Almost every other sentence of that article is a debunked birther talking point.


9 posted on 09/17/2010 8:26:30 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
The other names he has used, that we currently know are: Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham.

When did he ever use "Barack Dunham" or "Barry Dunham"? I mean, I've seen *Birthers* call him those names, but I've never seen any instance when Obama himself used the surname Dunham for himself.

During the Presidential debates with Senator John McCain, Obama never once addressed his opponent as “Senator McCain” or “Mr. McCain”.

Well that's easy to disprove: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/10/debate-transcri.html

Four sentences in, and the Birther article has already started manufacturing multiple imaginary claims out of whole cloth. Which is par for Birthers and their time-tested tactic of 'Make crap up'.

10 posted on 09/17/2010 2:02:05 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Did zero piss off the Russians?
Maybe zero should hit the ‘Reset button’ again.


11 posted on 09/17/2010 2:32:19 PM PDT by CoastWatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
If Obama or Soetoro or Dunham had been born on the floor of the Oval Office, he is not eligible to be President.

For $25 or less, or probably no more than a phone call and a fax to Hawaii he can release his birth certificate and shut everybody up, once and for all. But he won’t do that.

So everyone would shut up, even though Obama still wouldn't be eligible? I think birthers should step back a moment and figure out what, exactly, they're arguing.

12 posted on 09/17/2010 5:17:49 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
I think birthers should step back a moment and figure out what, exactly, they're arguing.

First it was the Birth Certificate. Then it was the Natural Born Citizen status.

And now it's Birth Eligibility Disruption.

Rebranding...learn it, love it.

13 posted on 09/19/2010 3:20:37 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

There is no President Obama:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-no-president-obama/


14 posted on 01/28/2011 6:20:15 AM PST by Robert Laity (Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

There is no President Obama:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-no-president-obama/


15 posted on 01/28/2011 6:20:21 AM PST by Robert Laity (Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

There is no President Obama:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-no-president-obama/


16 posted on 01/28/2011 6:20:27 AM PST by Robert Laity (Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson