Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hawthorn
Cool, thanks for crunching the numbers. I guess it is just chalked up to random variability. I had seen all the posts about the weekend effect, and once you expect to see something, it is easy to find data points to back it up (After all 3/7 bumps would be during a weekend in a simple random sample).

The chart has been all over the place as of late. To be honest as long as it stays under -10 I think we are OK.
20 posted on 09/20/2010 8:04:16 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: GonzoGOP; OKSooner; SoFloFreeper; markomalley

>> as long as it stays under -10 I think we are OK <<

Probably a decent rule of thumb. But in fact, the situation has long been MUCH better:

The 10-day moving average of the Rasmussen index has been at -10 or lower ever since November 2009. Today it stands at -15.8.

Moreover, if we take Rasmussen’s sample data and weight them by a ten percent “enthusiasm difference” between the pro-Ø and the anti-Ø voters, it appears that the Big Ø’s probable re-elect percentage has hovered right around 40% for the past four months, sometimes down to 39% and sometimes up to 41%.

Let the numbers stay right there. Frankly, I have trouble understanding why so many Freepers continue to whine that the percentages for Big Ø are still too high. The current levels are good enough for me!


22 posted on 09/20/2010 8:50:21 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson