OK, there's more.
In the same story I linked to in my first post (did you actually read the article?), there is also the story of another child who was with Obama for several years of schooling. His photo is below.
As the kindergartner grows into an elementary school child in Hawaii, he begins to look more and more like the Obama that we saw in the Christmastime airport photo, and as a teen and as Obama of today. Yes?
And yet, for you it is unreasonable to reserve judgement on the matter when the only evidence is a second hand report of an unlikely event by habitual liars.
This stuff has been out there for years. Why am I doing your research for you. Your own intransigence is not a shield to be used against others. Maybe the dissonance is elsewhere?
Go figure.
Yeah.
-PJ
“This stuff has been out there for years.”
I’ve been keeping up as best I can, but this is the first time I have seen those photos. I don’t know where “out there” is, but I’m not going to apologize for an inability to absorb all the information that is available today.
When, by the way, did you come across those photos?
“Why am I doing your research for you.”
When a person gives some very good reasons that the evidence presented at a given point in time is not persuasive, it is incumbent upon the person making the assertion to present additional facts or argument...or to take his ball and go home.
You’re not doing my research, you’re arguing your own position.
“Your own intransigence is not a shield to be used against others.”
Do what? (Mirth) Once again, I gave some good reasons that the newspaper article is not persuasive. That is hardly intransigence.
“Maybe the dissonance is elsewhere?”
Nah.