Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamacare: The sequel: President might use diktats to up the ante
Washington Times ^ | 09/17/2010 | Scott Atlas

Posted on 09/21/2010 4:02:58 AM PDT by iowamark

A highly partisan Democrat-dominated Congress passed President Obama's sweeping legislation in March to shift decision-making and authority to the government and fundamentally transform America's health care..

We already know that Mr. Obama and the Democrats are willing to sign laws that the majority of Americans oppose. And despite continued opposition from about 60 percent of Americans, the administration continues to defy the will of the people with warnings and threats to the private sector in advance of implementing the plan's big-government mandates, coverage decrees and price controls. In this waning phase of Democratic domination, what might we expect as last-gasp overreaches in health care?

Watch for an overt use of brute force by the federal government to eliminate the viability of private health insurance.

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius already has confirmed that the exchanges, justified by the administration as a vehicle to increase consumer choice and lower prices by facilitating competition, will actually bar private insurers from participating unless prices are fixed at government-dictated rates...

Watch for the federal government to restrict doctors from practicing, or possibly even criminalize them, unless they accept patients with insurance paying government-defined rates for medical tests and treatments.

As more Americans are shifted into government insurance, prices for medical services will be forced lower and lower - indeed, the new health law is overtly configured to cut payments for Medicare services by 30 percent over the next three years; by 2019, payments for senior-citizen care will be even lower than Medicaid...

When Congress passed the health legislation plan that the president sought, it radically changed health care in the United States and audaciously imposed a strong-armed federal government onto perhaps the most personal of all segments of American life...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: healthcare; obamacare
Dr. Scott W. Atlas is a professor at the Stanford University Medical Center and a senior fellow at the school's Hoover Institution.

A good preview of what will happen under Obamacare.

1 posted on 09/21/2010 4:03:00 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Congress controls the purse strings. Simply stop playing for it. He can issue all the rules he wants, doesn’t mean squat if the Congress refuses to authorize any funding for them.


2 posted on 09/21/2010 4:09:14 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
"We already know that Mr. Obama and the Democrats are willing to sign laws that the majority of Americans oppose."

Sounds like the beginnings of Venezuela happening here.

3 posted on 09/21/2010 4:12:37 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

mean while “Health insurers drop coverage for children ahead of new rules”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2593140/posts

What to go Democrats...solve one issue and cause another! Typical of the left..creating more mayhem


4 posted on 09/21/2010 4:13:17 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Congress controls the purse strings. Simply stop playing for it. He can issue all the rules he wants, doesn’t mean squat if the Congress refuses to authorize any funding for them.

At first I thought that approach might work. But what will happen is the leftists will make sure the lack of funding produces painful (deadly) consequences which will be carefully "spun" by the media.

Have you ever watched a local school board that didn't get the funding they want? The school board immediately enacts "cuts" that cause the maximum pain for parents. In that way they get what they want. The federal government will do the same thing...

5 posted on 09/21/2010 4:31:19 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski

Vote for the school budget or we kill the first grade bunny.


6 posted on 09/21/2010 4:33:06 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If the answer is "Republican", it must be a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski
Then use the power of Congressional oversight to hold public hearings exposing what the bureaucrats are really spending the money on and demand answers on whey they cut needed services to keep the fat.

This is war. The Leftist machine know that. Time we start fighting back.

7 posted on 09/21/2010 4:34:06 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Remember, they can do anything between Nov 2nd and Jan 15th...vigilance and game plan must be in place to stop their mandates and exec orders.


8 posted on 09/21/2010 4:41:31 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich; All
I'm not sure if that's correct. If Christine O'Donnell wins Delaware, isn't she seated immediately because it's a vacant seat?





Well with Biden it was intellectually vacant anyway ...

9 posted on 09/21/2010 4:48:20 AM PDT by j.argese (Liberal thought process = oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

If the pubbies gain control of both houses, they should turn all the new IRS employees, marked for healthcare, to audit the government ITSELF and find every ounce of fat and corruption in the existing bureaucracy.

Step two is to fire at least 25% of the bureaucracy, preferably the most liberal/marxist 25%.


10 posted on 09/21/2010 4:48:23 AM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson