Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009
"I am confused... shouldn't she be in jail for being in possession of and distributing child pornography?"

Yes you are. Read the article. She didn't distribute anything, the school and district attorney distributed the photos to far more people than she did. Using your logic, they should be in jail, not her.

23 posted on 09/21/2010 12:21:52 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: monday
She admits sending the photos to her boyfriend.

If she had been 5 years old would it have been ok? what if the photos had shown her in sex acts with herself? if the boyfriend and her had broken up could he have posted the photos online?

31 posted on 09/21/2010 12:28:09 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: monday

using your logic child pornography can never be prosecuted because the prosecutor, police, judge and jury would never be able to view the photos.


35 posted on 09/21/2010 12:31:26 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson