Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major health insurers to stop offering new child-only policies (Blame Goes to ObamaCare)
Washington Post ^ | 20 Sep 10 | N.C. Aizenman

Posted on 09/22/2010 2:54:52 PM PDT by SkyPilot

Some of the country's most prominent health insurance companies have decided to stop offering new child-only plans, rather than comply with rules in the new health-care law that will require such plans to start accepting children with preexisting medical conditions after Sept. 23.

The companies will continue to cover children who already have child-only policies. They will also accept children with preexisting conditions in new family policies.

Nonetheless, supporters of the new health-care law complain that the change amounts to an end run around one of the most prized consumer protections.

"We're just days away from a new era when insurance companies must stop denying coverage to kids just because they are sick, and now some of the biggest changed their minds," Ethan Rome, executive director of Health Care for America Now, an advocacy group, said in a statement. "[It] is immoral, and to blame their appalling behavior on the new law is patently dishonest."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: childonly; healthcare; insurance; obamacare
Way to go Pelos-Reid-Obama!


1 posted on 09/22/2010 2:54:57 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Blame Business First.
Blame American First.
Blame Bush First.
Blame, Blame, Blame, yada, yada, yada.

Yawn.

2 posted on 09/22/2010 2:59:09 PM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I hate that stupid little laugh she has...


3 posted on 09/22/2010 2:59:40 PM PDT by FortWorthPatriot (Obama is no Hitler; Hitler got the Olympics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Ethan Rome, executive director of Health Care for America Now, an advocacy group, should've ,said in a statement. "[It] is immoral the only thing they could do in light of the ghastly vile Obamacare rules, and to blame their appalling behavior on the appalling new law is patently dishonest justified."

There. Fixed it.

4 posted on 09/22/2010 3:05:04 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876 (Language, Borders, Culture, Full employment for those here legally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
OBAMACARE
WEARING IT WITH PRIDE, BECAUSE HE'S A DUMB ASS

5 posted on 09/22/2010 3:07:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (All hail Prince Skid-mark, Barack Hussein Obama, constantly soiling himself and our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
“The companies will continue to cover children who already have child-only policies”

No they aren't. I got a letter a month ago telling me to find new coverage for my kid's insurance. I ended up putting him on my company plan at $150 more a month.

6 posted on 09/22/2010 4:10:57 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“Nonetheless, supporters of the new health-care law complain that the change amounts to an end run around one of the most prized consumer protections.”

How exactly is it “an end run” to be driven out of business by making it impossible to continue to sell your product due to malicious government control?

Will it then be a “major end run” when all insurance companies are eventually forced to quit selling all of their policies and simply go our of business?


7 posted on 09/22/2010 5:10:42 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the Right Stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

The insurance companies don’t want to have charity and medicaid children (up to 26??) dumped onto them.


8 posted on 09/22/2010 6:45:52 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (11/2/10-Obama: Close your eyes and think of Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
The insurance companies don’t want to have charity and medicaid children (up to 26??) dumped onto them.

A co-worker was talking about his "kid" who is 25 who he is demanding be put on his insurance.

I told him there is a term for a 25 year old "kid" - a grown man.

By the time I was 25, I had worked as a civilian engineer, I was an Air Force officer, instructor pilot, and aircraft commander - flying all over the world doing dangerous jobs, and fighting in wars.

I wasn't sleeping in my parents basement until past noon.

9 posted on 09/23/2010 3:18:20 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson