I believe that what the reporter if referring to is the picture of the girl from FLDS that was forced into marriage at an early age.
IIRC, there were comments that because the girl was underage at the time of the photo, (even though she was completely dressed), it ‘could’ be considered child porn (which was completely laughable).
I can see from the majority of comments on here, that I am wrong about the original incident.
OH well, next time I’ll read the whole thread before I post.
(well.... I’ll try)