Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA
The article says they backed down so his veto wouldn't be overridden.

That was a good thing, it allowed the clinics to have funds cut off.

26 posted on 09/23/2010 7:27:00 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

The key phrase is backed down. That implies that they changed their position from supporting the veto override to opposing it. That tells me they did it grudgingly and their heart wasn’t in it.


36 posted on 09/23/2010 7:31:51 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
The article says they backed down so his veto wouldn't be overridden.

I'm ecstatic that someone had the gonads to tell it like it is and slam the leftists. When conservatives take a staunch stand, they do more than just cause a single obstruction to leftist nihilists; they cause other not-so-committed, timid "conservatives" to dare to take a stand with them. It's contagious, thank God!

132 posted on 09/23/2010 1:57:20 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson