Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rogue yam

Why does someone have to confine their property (dog) because they call the police. If the dog is well trained and does not attack the police the police have no right to do anything to the dog. The article does not indicate the dog was doing anything to the police. This looks to me like an over reaction by the police and a destruction of private property.


43 posted on 09/23/2010 10:48:52 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Ratman83
Why does someone have to confine their property (dog) because they call the police. If the dog is well trained and does not attack the police the police have no right to do anything to the dog. The article does not indicate the dog was doing anything to the police. This looks to me like an over reaction by the police and a destruction of private property.

The article does not state exactly what the dog was doing or where. Nor does it state what the local laws are concerning how dogs must be confined. I expressed no opinion as to whether the officer's actions were legal or reasonable. I did not say that someone "has to" confine their dog. I just think it is stupid not to. You have police responding to a report of a violent crime. They are going to be concerned for their own safety and acutely aware of potential threats. Why wouldn't you take your dog inside while you talk to the police?

45 posted on 09/23/2010 11:11:23 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson