Posted on 09/23/2010 7:55:47 AM PDT by jessduntno
House Republicans on Wednesday night released their long-anticipated "Pledge to America" to mixed reviews from conservative commentators. Some pundits reacted favorably, calling the 21-page document an impressive step beyond the 1994 GOP "Contract with America." But others blasted the document as light on substance and short on promises to key conservative voting blocs, such as the Tea Party and social conservatives.
"Is the pledge as bold as the Contract?" write the editors of the National Review. "The answer is: The pledge is bolder. The Contract with America merely promised to hold votes on popular bills that had been bottled up during decades of Democratic control of the House. The pledge commits Republicans to working toward a broad conservative agenda that, if implemented, would make the federal government significantly smaller, Congress more accountable, and America more prosperous."
The conservative magazine goes on to call the Pledge's section on jobs "impressive" and hails the GOP for addressing social issues by promising to enact a law banning federal funding of abortion.
By contrast conservative blogger Erick Erickson of RedState.com says the Pledge pales in comparison to the Contract.
"These 21 pages tell you lots of things, some contradictory things, but mostly this: it is a serious of compromises and milquetoast rhetorical flourishes in search of unanimity among House Republicans because the House GOP does not have the fortitude to lead boldly in opposition to Barack Obama," Erickson writes. "Like a diet full of sugar, it will actually do nothing but keep making Washington fatter before we crash from the sugar high."
He contends that the pledge fixates on goals the GOP should already be working toward while ignoring meaningful, long term goals.
"There is a promise to 'immediately reduce spending' by cutting off stimulus funds. Wow. Exciting," he writes.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
"Here is the GOP cruising to a handsome election victory," Frum writes. "Did you seriously imagine that they would jeopardize the prospect of victory and chairmanships by issuing big, bold promises to do deadly unpopular things?"
The Pledge's timidity amounts to "a repudiation of the central, foundational idea behind the Tea Party," Frum continues.
Some conservatives like FRUM are VERY disappointed, according to See BS.
It’s a very good start to be sure.
But the most important thing is the FOLLOW THROUGH.
WE WANT TO SEE RESULTS.
AND STARTING IN JANUARY WITH THE NEW CONGRESS WE WILL EXPECT RESULTS.
Is there anything in there about the basic, fundamental, Declaration of Independence guaranteed RIGHT TO LIFE, without which all other “Pledges” are meaningless? . . . didn’t see it!
Still looks like a “hey, vote for us . . . c’mon . . . “ type pledge.
Look guys, we have a little document called the Constitution and another called the Declaration of Independence. That is what we’re going by so get in, sit down, shut up, and hold on.
Figures the idiots at National Review would think this thing is great. I can see Rich Lowery’s limp wrist a-twitching.
Yeah thats how I see it. I’ll adress my complaints to my cogressional nominee.
“Pledge to America” Unveiled by Republicans (Full Text)
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20017335-503544.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody
Jobs:
- Stop job-killing tax hikes
- Allow small businesses to take a tax deduction equal to 20 percent of their income
- Require congressional approval for any new federal regulation that would add to the deficit
- Repeal small business mandates in the new health care law.
Cutting Spending:
- Repeal and Replace health care
- Roll back non-discretionary spending to 2008 levels before TARP and stimulus (will save $100 billion in first year alone)
- Establish strict budget caps to limit federal spending going forward
- Cancel all future TARP payments and reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Reforming Congress:
- Will require that every bill have a citation of constitutional authority
- Give members at least 3 days to read bills before a vote
Defense:
- Provide resources to troops
- Fund missile defense
- Enforce sanctions in Iran
It is long on typical political rhetoric, short on specifics.
Instead of 21 pages of gobbledygook, why not 10 things they promise to do or resign if they don't?
Accually Right to life IS in the Document.
Now the propaganda begins. NO “conservative” should make ANY comments on this document.
Feeds the msm propaganda machine.
To the T.E.A. Partiers, Conservativism is a set of core values.
Time for Conservatives to start calling to account those habitual traitors in the GOP Establishment like Brooks, Frum, Erickson et ac who falsely call themselves “Conservatives”.
“To some Republicans like John MeCain & the RNC leadership, Conservatism is a political strategy. To the T.E.A. Partiers, Conservativism is a set of core values.”
We are trying to save a Republic; they are trying to save their jobs. The Grand Old Potty needs to be flushed of the party hacks.
This document is a cynical jump to the front of an already moving parade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.