Posted on 09/24/2010 3:16:37 PM PDT by mojito
Lost amid the campaign politicking are several growing crises that all, to one degree or another, reflect the general global appraisal that the United States has abdicated its traditional role, either on the grounds of fiscal erosion or self-doubt about our moral authority to pass judgment on aggressors.
In that void, China and Japan have been squaring off over a maritime territorial dispute, North and South Korea are seeing rising tensions, Lebanon is unwinding, Iran is daring the world to stop its proliferation, and, in the expectation of a post-American Afghanistan, regional powers are designing their own spheres of control there. In all these cases — and others as well — there is a general sense that the U.S. will not come strongly to the side of an ally, nor come out strongly against the side of an enemy.
In an analogous sense, we have now completed our own version of 1977–78, with updated Carteresque damnations of past policies, loud lectures on past American sins, estrangement from Europe and Israel, and self-righteousness about our evolution beyond simplistic views of good and evil. All that is left now is the denouement: another 1979–80, when the world sized us up and concluded that there would be few repercussions from regional “adjustments,” and wars by the Soviet Union, China, and Communists in Central America, hostage-taking, embassy-storming, and all the rest paralyzed a sanctimonious president.
The immortal words of Jimmy Carter on the Voyager spacecraft gold record.
bump for later read
Who may, in fact, be a Reaganette.
I’m sure that Jimmy made sure to include a record player and extra batteries in case intelligent life found the record 10,000 years from now.
Yup. See my “about” page.
Just before the 1980 vote, I figured I'd get myself a good "assault" rifle if Carter got reelected. He didn't, and I didn't.
Well, I'm not waiting for the next election. Meeting my daughter at the range in the morning. She is dying to try out the new AR 15 I got a few weeks ago.
BTW, Cabella's has got $5 shipping on $99+ orders. Their ammo prices are pretty good. Way better than Wal Mart.
He’ll be out before this term ends...Feb. 2011....
What we need now is a Patton/Sherman/Custer//Stonewall Jackson/Mic Collins in 1 individual (or 2-3 into a single fighting force, and NO Palin won't do here) and go for the gonads/throat of the enemy, again and again and again 'till they are a bloody pulp on the tarmak.
As solid as Reagan was he would be no match by himself for the formidable enemies we face now.
Thanks for the Cabella’s tip. You were right, great prices.
Just placed an order and it may be worth a drive to go to their store in Nevada.
You and I are going to have to disagree on this, but I have a question. Did you think, at the time, that Reagan/Bush could have ended the Cold War without firing a shot?
Not sure what you are refering to.
As for Reagan ending the ColdWar, he did what he had to so, as bloody as necessary, so again what are you asking ....??
As for Bush, he was no real help but Reagan had to include him to molofy the Rockefeller/RINO and keep them in check....
I'll expand on it. When Reagan/Bush were sworn in in 1981, did you believe the Cold War would end the way it did ten years later?
In 1981 I had no specific notion that the ColdWar would end. However, as the decade progressed I came to the notion that we could “spend them to death” as they had no means of paying for their basic necessities (recall wheat sales because of failed farming methods) and that seems to be what happened.
So how did you come to that series of thoughts from my initial post ?? A non-seqitor to me.
I was just trying to inject some optimism into your post. Nothing more.
Palin however seems to have less of an understanding of the CultureWar (or her take on it is fractionated and not complete, yet) than Reagan did and less willingness to take on the bloody-mindedness needed to fight the enemy today.
She could have NOT backed McCain, etc but she seems “too nice” to succeed at this war and that would fit with her being a woman - its not in the DNA for women to have that much “organized frightful being” needed to fight like men do.
But she seems able to motivate others who do have a solid understanding of the CultureWar and that bloody-mindedness needed to sustain a warfare attitude.
She herself has said as much when MSM try to box her in but she is adept and astute enough to play the word-game and keep them at a distance. And don't confuse any OTHER female poli-leaders by analogy. Palin is specific to here and now. What Thatcher or any other females do or did is IRRELEVANT.
It is not a question of his being a “match” but not having the background to take on such an elusive and dedicated enemy. We are having problems getting folks today to step up to the fight with the sort of awareness I'm suggesting.
Reagan would be too old and that is not a chide against him but a fact of nature.
D. Horowitz, G. Wilders, P.Geller, - these folks and others like them seem to have the understanding I'm referring to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.