“According to the “logic” that I’ve seen used here on FR before, this now officially makes O’Donnell a RINO”
Maybe you can post an example. From what I’ve seen of the “logic” here on FR:
1) A RINO endorses a RINO candidate = a RINO candidate
2) A RINO endoreses a Conservative candidate = a Conservative candidate
3) A Conservative endoreses a RINO candidate = a RINO candidate
4) A Conservative endorses a Conservative candidate = a Conservative candidate
If you detect a pattern here, then good for you! A RINO endorsement does not make a Conservative a RINO; nor does a Conservative endorsement make a RINO a Conservative.
Like I said, perhaps you can cite an example of when this “logic” did not follow on FR.
Some people use the argument but it doesn’t always hold.
Palin a conservative candidate endorced mccain a rino - some people called palin a rino but most say conservative.
It seems to be stock in trade among some on here to think that because Romney supports DeMint, this makes DeMint "questionable" at least.