Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walking away from a mortgage might make sense
San Jose Mercury News ^ | September 26, 2010 | LINDSAY A. OWENS

Posted on 09/26/2010 7:41:50 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Millions of middle-income home- owners are struggling to pay down bloated, underwater mortgages while wealthier Americans are simply mailing in the keys to the mansion and calling it a day.

It's time for average Americans to start seeing their mortgage papers for what they are: records of financial transactions, not moral documents.

In a free-market society, an individual homeowner is not responsible for the strength of the nation's housing market. If anything, walkers may stimulate the economy, by spending a portion of the money they were sending to the banks each month.

Take a look at your finances and decide for yourself whether homeownership makes sense. A better decision for the future of your family may be to rent, pay off your credit cards, and put the savings in a college fund for your children or grandchildren.

Walk away from your house if it will be better for you to rent. And remember, walking away now doesn't mean that homeownership may not work for you later.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2manycrooks; crookedborrowers; failure; foreclosure; obamanomics; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-236 next last
To: CodeToad

I agree...


181 posted on 09/26/2010 3:16:13 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
they act as though only the rich can buy an envelope to drop keys into...

Actually, I think the point she is making is that the wealthy are the one mose often doing this, and that she thinks the middle class should be doing it more.

182 posted on 09/26/2010 3:48:19 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: kabar

OMG, you don’t understand that the Stupid Investor owes the bank $300k. The bank should be pursuing a deficiency judgment. If the Stupid Investor is insolvent, that would be a waste of money but if he is not, then it should be pursued.


183 posted on 09/26/2010 4:03:58 PM PDT by Defiant (Liberals care more about the Koran than they did about Terri Schiavo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Your first post to me was snarky and it in fact was condescending, something to the effect of “did you notice that foreclosures are at an all time high”. My response was similar, then you went postal. I am not arrogant, and only condescending to those who are not too bright, but want to argue their unsupported assertions anyway.


184 posted on 09/26/2010 4:07:13 PM PDT by Defiant (Liberals care more about the Koran than they did about Terri Schiavo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
LOL. No, the guy who has the money is the one who must decide whether the risk is warranted or not. Banks also loan money to businesses, which can also fail. If you make a bad loan, you must be willing to suffer the consequences.

The banks set the interest rates for the loan and use the value of the home as collateral, which is why it is appraised. And as you know, on a thirty year loan most of your initial payments are interest rather than principle and you pay much more over the length of the loan in interest than the actual amount of the loan.

You are responsible for what you signed and so is the bank. You know the conditions of the loan and the penalties should you fail to meet those conditions. The bank can take possession of the house if you don't pay your mortgage payments.

185 posted on 09/26/2010 4:09:35 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

LOL. Now you are changing your story. Go back under your rock. I don’t have time for dim bulbs.


186 posted on 09/26/2010 4:11:31 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys

Here’s a hint: the ideal tenant is one who always pays 15 days late, including the late fee, and renews his or her lease year after year, including an increase, because they feel they are beating the system. I’ve had several of them, and as a landlord, you gotta’ love em.

One of many counter-intuitive things the books don’t tell you.

Want another?

Check the tenant’s reference with the landlord *previous* to the current landlord.


187 posted on 09/26/2010 4:12:26 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kabar
LOL. No, the guy who has the money is the one who must decide whether the risk is warranted or not.

And guess which one didn't live up to the agreement that he signed?!

The idiot took the gamble with someone elses money that he borrowed and promised to pay back. Just because he lost doesn't mean that he still doesn't owe the money to the bank.

If he walks away then he is a crook in my opinion.

He still owes the money and what he has left isn't worth the balance of the mortgage. His decision was to borrow money and gamble with it. He lost.

188 posted on 09/26/2010 4:29:51 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Are you going to stiff your friend?”

Totally different... If I hadn’t paid my friend yet, and he charged me interest on the balance to cover his risk of the deal falling through, then I would return the gold to him and cancel the deal. On the other hand if I had given him 10% down, I would expect him to keep the 10%. What we are talking about is a contract - and a contract is only valid if fair to both parties.I’m paying him to assume a risk (with the interest payment). I’m not being paid to take a risk.


189 posted on 09/26/2010 5:15:19 PM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
If someone has the ability to pay back a loan and they don't, then they are a cheat and a deadbeat. American morality is getting really squishy if people start thinking that being a cheat and a deadbeat is okay.

If they aren't breaking the law, they aren't a cheat. Cheating means breaking the rules. The rules are called laws. No law-breaking, no cheating.

Deadbeat? If someone is acting in their own best interests, within the law, pragmatically and rationally, I don't call that a deadbeat. I call it sensible.

All that said, I just refi-ed my mortgage from a 20yr at 6% to a 10 year at 4%. Haven't touched the equity, which is over 80K. But if my back was up against the wall, lame name-calling wouldn't stop me from acting in my own best interests. Banks don't loan money out of the kindness of their hearts. It's business.

Bottom line: Don't be a sucker.

190 posted on 09/26/2010 5:20:50 PM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the minority? A: They're complaining about the deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: allmost
Not “stupid people” in many cases

Nope, not "stupid," just morally diseased filth.

191 posted on 09/26/2010 5:23:21 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: babygene
I don’t believe there is a moral or legal obligation involved. It’s a business deal, nothing more.

You should be glad your insurance company isn't allowed to see contracts the way you do. You'd be F*ed in at least one orifice by now.

192 posted on 09/26/2010 5:30:47 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
You call yourself an officer. When did the army start promoting sleazy slimeballs past the butterbar stage?
193 posted on 09/26/2010 5:40:28 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
No doubt he lost. The bank has the house and any equity he built in the house. And the bank probably has an asset that is no longer worth the appraisal value. So they both lose.

The idiot took the gamble with someone elses money that he borrowed and promised to pay back. Just because he lost doesn't mean that he still doesn't owe the money to the bank.

You jest I am sure. If he walks away, then he doesn't owe any money to the bank. The bank keeps the house, which was the collateral for the loan. The terms and conditions in the loan agreement obtain. It is pretty simple. The same holds true if someone doesn't pay his car loan. The car is repossessed. The former owner is not expected to pay the remainder of the loan and lose the car to boot.

I thought you said you purchased property before. Take a look at the mortage agreement you signed.

And what do you do with the millions of people who have had to foreclose on their houses? Put them into debtor prison?

If he walks away then he is a crook in my opinion.

You are entitled to your opinion, just not your own facts.

194 posted on 09/26/2010 5:41:53 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Why would you pay for credit cards if you won’t pay your mortgage?


195 posted on 09/26/2010 5:44:38 PM PDT by ully2 (ully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

“You should be glad your insurance company isn’t allowed to see contracts the way you do.”

They are, they just have to file for bankruptcy - Just like the individual.


196 posted on 09/26/2010 5:54:01 PM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: CA Conservative
She's not treating it like a negotiated agreement. She's leaving the impression that the rich are walking away and getting away with something. If members of the middle class acted without full understanding - and 'mailed' in the keys, their credit would be ruined and they would still be responsible for loans against their house. As would the rich or anyone else for that matter.

You have to remember who she writes for - and that her 'groupthink bunch' hates the middle class. Her advice is designed to inflict class envy - it's not designed to help anyone...

197 posted on 09/26/2010 6:44:11 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2589165/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
What this author (a Ph.D. candidate at Stanford) suggests would more than damage the private banks and further strengthen the govt financial entities.

She's probably a radical leftists who's never owned a home and hates the middle class. Destroying the banking system for someone like her, would be a turn-on - - the politics of resentment... usually against "mommy and daddy" who put her through college...

198 posted on 09/26/2010 7:15:03 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2589165/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: allmost
I think you may be using a rather large brush to characterize other’s circumstances. Some are first time buyers. Some get screwed with nefarious brokers. Some may have personal financial issues which happen in life. When someone buys a house for say $300,000 and someone 2 years later says it's only worth $190,000 things get complicated.

I do agree with you and I do know of a situation where things fell apart beyond the individual's control and they lost their house.

But then I think about what my husband and I did. We researched the area for years before we even decided to move here and buy property. We were well aware that the market was falling. Although we planned on staying here long-term, we set ourselves up in case we had to move. We bought *much* less house than we were qualified for. We got a 15 year fixed rather than a 30 year or an ARM. We've made extra payments. We paid off our other outstanding debt just in case things went wrong.

Now we're in a situation where we've just found out that we *will* be moving in less than two years. As things stand, we'll be able to sell the house for much less than we bought it for - if we have to. By having no other debt, we'll be able to continue to pay the mortgage for years while living in apartments if the house fails to sell.

For some reason, people don't *think* about getting a mortgage anymore. They don't seriously weigh the issues that could come up. They don't ask themselves, "What if we have to move and the house doesn't sell??" "What if I loose my job?" "What if an emergency comes up and I need extra cash?" No. The average person believes that things will always continue as they are today.

When I look at the sacrifices my family has made to behave with financial maturity, it's harder for me to feel sympathetic. I don't blame the "predatory lenders". I blame the suckers who couldn't take an hour to research the loan implications on their own. I blame the government that made it inviting for the banks to take risks on people who obviously couldn't afford it. I blame the people who bought the most expensive house that the bank would allow, leaving themselves house-poor with no wiggle room.

Yes, crap happens and sometimes it really is nobody's fault. But most people who are in foreclosure could've avoided it at many points along the way. There is a reason foreclosures are at a record level. Banks and individuals have never behaved this way en masse before.

199 posted on 09/26/2010 7:56:50 PM PDT by Marie (Obama seems to think that Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since Camp David, not King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

LOL...thanks for not answering any of my questions or pointing out any actual logical flaws. LET THEM EAT CAKE! People like you must get along with people like Obama VERY well.


200 posted on 09/26/2010 7:57:38 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson