Yes, that was a post from a different thread, about a different article you posted. It was a comment about the article you posted, based on a comment I read at the site you linked.
Again, if you don’t want people to make their own opinionated comments about what you post, you probably should not post them to a site that exists for people to make comments about what you post.
As to why I don’t post things, I do when nobody else has posted a story that I find interesting and that seems to be in line with the express purpose of this site to advance the conservative cause.
We certainly don’t need more people posting for the sake of posting — I think you are doing a fine enough job at that for at least a dozen freepers.
It’s almost a shame they can’t give you a tool that would just let you hit a button and post every article from the blogs you follow — I imagine it takes you a bit of time to enter each of them every day.
BTW, I don’t understand why you would be upset about my attacks on some web site you post information from. It’s not like I’m attacking anything you are saying, right?
It’s not like it’s your web site, or that you are the author of the stuff I am ridiculing. You are just the person who posted it so we could discuss it.
As to your comment “If you so hate the sites I post from”, well I hate the New York Times, but that doesn’t stop freepers from posting things from the NYTimes, or me from commenting about how stupid the people are that write for the NY Times.
In fact, most of the political postings around here are from people and sites we dislike, and we all mock the postings and the papers and whatever else we feel like mocking.
Which again makes me wonder why you think that nobody should mock the stuff you post, or why you are so upset that I choose to hold a negative opinion about the value of what the people say in some of the articles you post.
You say the same thing everyday about the same sites...as if no-one read it yesterday or the day before.
After a while it seems the intent is to disrupt.
Why not let the reader make his own judgement about the quality of the article or the publishing site?