Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2010 8:50:03 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: rhema

Man there has to be something in a name. Every “Julia” I’ve ever met has been a liberal feminist. Actively looking at things in society people like and pointing out how they believe women are getting screwed over.


29 posted on 10/01/2010 10:01:55 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema; JoeProBono
...the more (tv) a boy watches, the more his views become sexist...

Or metrosexist

32 posted on 10/01/2010 10:07:47 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

My only problem with these animated films, is they offer a home to the actors and actresses who by virtue of their liberal beliefs, have lost the ability to draw revenue.

They turn off folks when on film, so they hide them away in these animated films as voices.


33 posted on 10/01/2010 10:09:30 AM PDT by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema
They reportedly analyzed 122 family films (rated G, PG and PG-13), including 50 top-grossing ones, between 2006 and 2009. She found it "startling" that there is "only one female character to every three male characters in family movies."

I can tell you with good authority that this is a very conscious decision from the studios for the simple reason that experience has borne out time and time again that boys won't go see a girl movie, but girls will go see a boy movie. Look at the current marketing for Disney's "Tangled." It's the Rapunzel story, but they're desperately trying to make it look like it's a boy movie.

34 posted on 10/01/2010 10:11:21 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
Baird isn't just an Angry Feminist; she's a hypocrite, too. Last year, her own magazine tried to embarrass Sarah Palin by putting an old photo of her on the cover in running shorts, suggesting this Caribou Barbie wasn't ready for prime time. Did Baird protest? No, she defended the cover since Palin "has been photographed and filmed more than once in aerobic gear."

Use these for all future Newsweak cover photos of our man-child prezzydent.


36 posted on 10/01/2010 10:22:34 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema
The female characters were also more likely than men to be beautiful

I should hope so

38 posted on 10/01/2010 10:29:07 AM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

Reminds me of the article about ten years ago when some woman complained about Disney characters’ cup sizes.


41 posted on 10/01/2010 10:33:29 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

I want Betty Boop back before the censors took her Boop-boop-be-doop away!


43 posted on 10/01/2010 10:35:23 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( AKA Rodrigo de Bivar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

“Sure, except there are few female characters in those films. There are certainly few doing anything meaningful or heroic — and no, Bo... “

She obviously didn’t see “Finding Nemo”, nor did she acknowledge that the “female” supporting character in that movie “stole the show” a number of times during the script, and portrayed a certain “heroic” sense to the character in spite of not being the “lead” character (Nemo).


48 posted on 10/01/2010 10:47:51 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

The owner of Newsweek is Jane Harmon’s husband.

He bought it for $1 about 2 months ago.


49 posted on 10/01/2010 10:50:31 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema
History and the Bible attest to the hatred the world has for GOOD. Evil is what is accepted and pushed over ever decreasing moral standards. Only licentiousness is promoted on television in varying ways continually.

Television and most every other entertainment and news source is largely an abomination regarding standards and morality. We have become inured to it and certainly the youth accept it almost completely.

51 posted on 10/01/2010 11:05:59 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rhema

Well, by all means, let’s make these family movies more like TV where the men are stupid and the women are the ones runnin’ the families.

Or make them like ABC “Family” programming. You know ... good “family” shows like Friday Night Lights or Secret Life of the American Teenager. Yeah ... good family shows right there, eh?


52 posted on 10/01/2010 11:40:03 AM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson