I wonder why. Do they know something? Do they have reason to suspect something?
Perhaps they do not want precipitate nationwide riots that are likely to occur should the first black president be removed from office.
I have no doubts that the Justices lives would be seriously at risk should they remove BHO from office by a ruling from the bench.
I the USSC chooses not to hear the case they do not typically give a reason so I expect to hear nothing from them on this case.
Even if the Court were to take this case, the end result would never be the Court “removing” Obama from office. At most, and this would be quite a lot, the Court might find that the Congress did not have or did not follow a constitutionally adequate PROCESS for determining if a candidate is a NBC and, therefore, constitutionally eligible to be President. Included in such a ruling might be the Court’s “clarification” on the constitutional standard for a NBC.
At that point, it would be up to Congress to react to the Court’s ruling and do whatever it is Congress thought complied with that ruling.
This is part of the transcript of the exchange between Congressman Serrano and Justice Thomas.
I included the discussion preceding the often cited exchange to add context.
Before what is posted below, there was a lot of details about court funding in general, but there was also some light hearted exchanges about the Red Sox, White Sox and Yankees. The atmosphere at the meeting was congenial and jovial.
There was no discussion of Obama, and there is no way of knowing if Thomas was thinking of the president or his eligibility. However, it is obvious from the transcript that Chairman Serrano was joking about his own eligibility to be president because of his Puerto Rican birth...and that is what Justice Thomas was responding to.
SERRANO: You know it's interesting, Justice Thomas, when you say it's a humbling experience. I'll tell you a quick experience that I had.
I represent, as you know, the South Bronx. And there’re a lot of immigrants in the South Bronx. There’re a lot of folks with English as a second language, a lot of poor folks, a lot of folks with little education. And so even explaining on a daily basis after 20 years in Congress what it is a member of Congress does, it's a daily routine for me either in the school, in the community center or on the street.
When Sonia Sotomayor was being considered, granted that a lot of the excitement was the fact that she was a woman from the Bronx, that she was a Hispanic woman, that her parents were from Puerto Rico. But there was no explanation on my part as to what she was being nominated for. Everybody understood la Corte Suprema (ph - Spanish).
You know it was as if they knew that this was huge. This was big. This was important. This was a coming of age for the community. And it became something where everywhere I went, you want to make sure this happens. So I say oh, yes, I spoke to the Senate; it's a done deal you know.
But the importance, I've told you in the past, much to the dismay of some of my friends on the left, but I feel a little uneasy about having a hearing for the Supreme Court because of the respect I have for the court. I don't always agree with its decisions, but I have a respect for it.
So it's humbling, but the public understands. The public understands the importance of what you do and the bearing it has on the future of our country. And so we always thank you for your service and tell the other seven that we do the same.
THOMAS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And it's always an honor being here. You and I have been at this together for a decade and a half. And...
SERRANO: I'm glad to hear that you don't think there has to be a judge on the court because I'm not a judge. I have never been a judge.
THOMAS: And you don't have to be born in the United States. You never have to answer that question.
SERRANO: Oh really?
THOMAS: Yes.
SERRANO: So you haven't answered the one about whether I can serve as president, but you answer this one.
THOMAS: We're evading that one. We're giving you another option.
SERRANO: Thanks a lot.
THOMAS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
SERRANO: Ms. Emerson?
In context, there is very little indication that it had anything to do with Obama.