Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What the hell: How stealth banking bailout reached Obama’s desk
MichelleMalkin.com ^ | 10-7-10 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 10/07/2010 8:03:55 AM PDT by STARWISE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: STARWISE

“As a rule of thumb, Congressional legislation that is bipartisan is usually twice as bad as legislation that is partisan.” — Thomas Sowell


21 posted on 10/07/2010 8:44:40 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

Both parties are almost equally corrupt in terms of banking and wall street.


22 posted on 10/07/2010 8:44:47 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

I guess it really shouldn’t be a surprise after knowing how those banksters like goldman sachs, jp morgan, citi paid off obama and many of the senators. I personally have nothing to do with those banks I went to a local bank way back when this all started happening but it’s disturbing now because as a taxpayer we still have to foot the bill and a report came out just the other day there is a $29 billion loss again from the old bailout.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/06/business/economy/06tarp.html


23 posted on 10/07/2010 8:45:21 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3808&tab=committees

Apr 27, 2010: This bill passed in the House of Representatives by voice vote. A record of each representative’s position was not kept.

Sep 27, 2010: This bill passed in the Senate by Unanimous Consent. A record of each senator’s position was not kept.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3808&tab=committees

The bill has been referred to the following committees:
House Judiciary
House Judiciary, Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy
Senate Judiciary

http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm

* Jeff Sessions, Alabama, Ranking Member
* Orrin Hatch, Utah
* Chuck Grassley, Iowa
* Jon Kyl, Arizona
* Lindsey Graham, South Carolina
* John Cornyn, Texas
* Tom Coburn, Oklahoma


24 posted on 10/07/2010 8:45:26 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

No politician that voted for this theft of private property ought to be re-elected. Publish the list, please.


25 posted on 10/07/2010 8:45:37 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
They’re fully willing to step-n-fetch for the bankers, just as the DNC is.

If they weren't, they would never be permitted to "win" an election.

26 posted on 10/07/2010 8:46:38 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ( "The right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." - Rowan Atkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

That they are.


27 posted on 10/07/2010 8:47:51 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
Photobucket

I'll second that!

28 posted on 10/07/2010 8:52:43 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Fear God and Government - especially when one tries to become the other!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chunga85

VERY BIG, VERY IMPORTANT PING!!!

History of the bill

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.3808:@@@X


29 posted on 10/07/2010 8:54:53 AM PDT by Roccus (......and then there were none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief; onyx; penelopesire; hoosiermama; Liz; nutmeg; SunkenCiv; SE Mom; GOP_Lady; Sub-Driver; ...

Jeeeeeeze ...

Thanks a million, maggie.

Records of votes aren’t required ?

What hammer/threats were held over
the pubbie’s heads to procure this ?

Or .. were there any ? What’s the deal ?


30 posted on 10/07/2010 8:57:18 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Sponsor
Rep Aderholt, Robert B. [AL-4]-Republican (introduced 10/14/2009)
Co-Sponsors
Rep Braley, Bruce L. [IA-1] - 10/14/2009-Democrat
Rep Castle, Michael N. [DE] - 10/14/2009-Republican
Rep Davis, Artur [AL-7] - 10/14/2009- Democrat


31 posted on 10/07/2010 8:59:12 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
What’s the deal ?

They are POLITICIANS!!!!!

Politician n. - A four letter word spelled with ten letters.

32 posted on 10/07/2010 9:00:17 AM PDT by Roccus (......and then there were none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

Correction: I stated a valid notary does not invalidate a fraudulent deal. I meant to write a valid notary does not validate a fraudulent deal. One can always prove fraud, no matter how valid the notaries.


33 posted on 10/07/2010 9:02:01 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

It is an attempt to reduce the furor over the records “abuses” in the current mass forclosure mess.

Notary evidence? I am not sure how this is a big issue. Most notaries simply state that the person who signed is who he says he is and that they witnessed the signature and the date.

Almost anyone can decide to be a notary. Is this a serious issue? Depends if there is a financial interest in the transaction.


34 posted on 10/07/2010 9:03:10 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil; caseinpoint

TF, CASE;

I don’t think people are necessarily upset with the substance of the bill. It’s the fact that in the face of recent allegations of fraud on the part of the financial industry- Dems and Pubs, by unanimous consent, stealthily, instantly legalize part of alleged fraud by federal fiat.


35 posted on 10/07/2010 9:13:28 AM PDT by VinL (VinL---It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Mike Castle?

Might explain the desperation of the RINOs to make sure he stayed in office.


36 posted on 10/07/2010 9:14:43 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

6.3 TRILLION we are on the hook for and this will ensure we get stuck paying for it and that figure was from last February I know for a fact that with all the foreclosures since it has skyrocketed since then and note this money was left out of the Federal Budget!

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-01/obama-keeps-fannie-freddie-off-u-s-budget-counts-dividends.html


37 posted on 10/07/2010 9:23:03 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL
instantly legalize part of alleged fraud by federal fiat.

I am certainly for prosecuting anyone who used "fraud" in the forclosure of homes. However if there is no "fraud" and the issue is recognition of a notary across state lines, that is another thing.

This may turn into a revenue enhancer for the legal profession and nothing of benefit will happen for those who were in forclosure. Is this a condemnation of interstate banking? Do you remember the discussion of that issue? Part of the problem of our time is that the institutions are so large as to be above accountability. Old Chinese proverb: "Today's problems were often yesterday's solutions."

38 posted on 10/07/2010 9:29:09 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Mike Castle?”

Interesting, eh?


39 posted on 10/07/2010 9:38:36 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Personaly I wonder if the surge of the tea party might not have triggered much of this mess because nobody knows if their corrupt congressman will be able to protect them any more.


40 posted on 10/07/2010 9:42:41 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson