To: Neil E. Wright
if it’s good enough for Talibunny, it’d make a great elk round too.
53 posted on
10/07/2010 1:15:25 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
To: NormsRevenge
Someone please explain to me why it's costing the Army $7,800 PER RIFLE to upgrade to the M24E1 (aka XM2010)? You could but NEW rifles for that money. What's not mentioned — the original M24 was DESIGNED from the start to be upgraded in the field to .300 Win Mag by unit armorers. From the photos the new rifle is 90 percent cosmetic changes. Anyone have a clue what's going on here?
54 posted on
10/07/2010 7:30:56 PM PDT by
MasterGunner01
(To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
To: NormsRevenge
Oops. That “but” should be “buy”.
Seriously, if we are really wanting to reach out, why not just go with the .338 Lapua Mag? The Brits are fielding it in the L115A3. This looks like another Army waste of taxpayer money when there are better long range precision rifles available of the shelf.
55 posted on
10/07/2010 8:06:22 PM PDT by
MasterGunner01
(To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
To: NormsRevenge
Ooops. That “but” should be “buy”.
Seriously, if we are really wanting to reach out, why not just go with the .338 Lapua Mag? The Brits are fielding it in the L115A3. This looks like another Army waste of taxpayer money when there are better long range precision rifles available off the shelf.
56 posted on
10/07/2010 8:07:52 PM PDT by
MasterGunner01
(To err is human; to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson