[darkangel82]

Incorrect. There is no severability clause. If one part is struck down, the whole thing is in the trash can.

[3niner]

Wishful thinking. The Supreme Court decided long ago that no severability clause is needed. Just watch, the Court will probably decide that something in the bill is unconstitutional, but I guarantee you that they won’t strike down the whole thing.

[freedomwarrior998]

Incorrect. There is no severability clause. If one part is struck down, the whole thing is in the trash can.

Wrong.

See: Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission, 286 U.S. 210, 234, 52 S.Ct. 559, 565, 76 L.Ed. 1062 (1932).