Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChildOfThe60s
This is embarrassing. This is so absurd to be passed off as scientific reasoning that it borders on mental illness.

Why?

12 posted on 10/09/2010 8:11:29 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Strategerist

This assumes underground aquifers are static and they aren’t. For example, the panhandle of Idaho sits atop a huge aquifer. You will find there the Lost River, and if memory serves, the Little Lost River. They are “lost” because the water in them eventually sinks into the aquifer. A lot of it emerges later near Twin Falls, Idaho but it is clear that aquifers are not closed off “water banks” from which there are only withdrawals, not deposits.


23 posted on 10/09/2010 8:26:50 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Strategerist
This is embarrassing. This is so absurd to be passed off as scientific reasoning that it borders on mental illness.

Really

Why?
Really?
28 posted on 10/09/2010 8:34:55 AM PDT by lewislynn ( It's not going to be who wins a seat, rather it will be who loses a seat that will save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson