Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Environment Chief (Lisa Jackson) Caught in the Campaign Crossfire
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 8, 2010 | STEPHEN POWER

Posted on 10/10/2010 3:11:36 PM PDT by reaganaut1

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson isn't on any ballots this November. But in some parts of the country, she might as well be.

Ms. Jackson's agency is becoming a foil for congressional candidates across the country. In South Dakota, Republican Kristi Noem has called for Ms. Jackson's resignation, citing the EPA's inaction on a request from ethanol producers to allow more ethanol in gasoline.

In Arkansas, embattled Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln is blasting Ms. Jackson's agency for promulgating "overreaching, burdensome" regulations on pesticides used by farmers.

In these states and others, Ms. Jackson's EPA has become a focal point of the argument about the role of federal regulation in the economy. Environmental and public-health groups that form an important part of the Democratic Party's constituency say a vigorous EPA is vital when Congress is deadlocked on environmental policy issues such as climate change.

But for Republicans and for some Democrats, the EPA is a symbol of a government that does too much and discourages job-creating investments. "It represents government out of control," said Rep. Sanford Bishop, (D., Ga.) when asked to describe his constituents' view of the agency.

Ms. Jackson has emerged as one of the Obama administration's most energetic regulators. During the past 18 months, the agency has proposed 42 "significant" regulations, according to OMB Watch, a left-leaning watchdog group. That compares with 16 in the first 18 months of the EPA during the George W. Bush administration. The government defines regulations as "significant" if they have an annual impact on the economy of $100 million or more or meet certain other criteria, such as raising new legal issues or interfering with other agencies' actions.

The new rules seek to reduce ozone pollution from factories and cars; coal ash waste from power plants; storm-water runoff from construction sites

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: Arkansas; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: epa; jackson; lisajackson

1 posted on 10/10/2010 3:11:38 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The EPA has gotta go. What a worthless, anti-progress department. Get rid of ‘em!


2 posted on 10/10/2010 3:14:35 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Less than 30 days to go to election day. I'm giddier than a TV weatherman during hurricane season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The only reason the EPA isn’t the most hated and despised federal entity is because we have the IRS.


3 posted on 10/10/2010 3:21:49 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Wait till their updated regs on dust control hit the news stands. Then watch the s### fly.


4 posted on 10/10/2010 3:26:15 PM PDT by bigheadfred ("We built a tower of stone. With our flesh and bone. To see him fly ." (RIP RJD))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
I had a neighbor that was a selectman [in my town]. He was some what of a moonbat, but he told me that the EPA constantly put them in catch-22 situations, such as not being able to get funds to help with a storm drain system upgrade, unless the storm drain system was upgraded.
5 posted on 10/10/2010 3:39:05 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Defund and get rid of them.


6 posted on 10/10/2010 3:43:19 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Defund and get rid of them.


7 posted on 10/10/2010 3:43:26 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I despise Lisa Jackson and she despises America. She is a hangman who is carrying out Obama’s orders to destroy our economy.

Jackson, Holder. Obama. Three toxic black racists. They hate the America I know. Holder probably got by on his own smarts but Obama and Jackson are big affirmative action babies.

Go to Wikipedia and read how Jackson has been working for various levels of government ever since you got out of college


8 posted on 10/10/2010 3:46:13 PM PDT by dennisw (- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confuscius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“In South Dakota, Republican Kristi Noem has called for Ms. Jackson’s resignation, citing the EPA’s inaction on a request from ethanol producers to allow more ethanol in gasoline.”

This kind of shiite coming from a republican is what is wrong with the stupid party.

Hey Kristi - why don’t you come over and I’ll let you try to start one of my carburated power equipment engines that has been ruined by your welfare farmer’s precious ethanol.


9 posted on 10/10/2010 4:04:10 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% white, 50% black, 100% red)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I don’t want more ethanol in my gas. It is right on
the edge of a damaging amount in modern motorcycle
engines. The damn farmers are going to ruin my
bikes to line their pockets.


10 posted on 10/10/2010 4:17:44 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 43north

I was reading through a thread of vstar 650 owners.
That bike has carbs. Ethanol creates a gel in cold
weather that can clog the small passages in the
carb. Adding some Seafoam helps to dry the fuel
and avoid the clogs. The Chevron station near
exit 113 of I-15 near Idaho Falls has a big sign that
says their gas has NO ethanol. It’s my preferred
supplier in that neighborhood.

Walmart sells Seafoam in the auto dept in the additives section.


11 posted on 10/10/2010 4:27:19 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Lisa Jackson


12 posted on 10/10/2010 4:27:41 PM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

It’s bad news for small engines too, generators, chainsaws, etc. If you leave ETOH/gas in these for many months, which is not uncommon, it gunks up the carburetors and you have to clean them out, not to mention it won’t start in an emergency. The only placed I can find non-ETOH gas around the Atlanta Metro is at marinas, all gas stations in the area have ETOH/gas since June ‘08. There are large increases of sales for additives to degrade the ETOH in gas.

The regulatory power of the EPA needs to be sharply curtailed (or eliminated).


13 posted on 10/10/2010 4:33:13 PM PDT by PCRit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PCRit

Ethanol is hygroscopic. The water it draws from the
air leads to rust in gas tanks, ice formation in
winter and gelling behavior. I have to ream the
small orifices of my Yamaha XT250 and TW200
carbs each Spring. Neither bike is over 1000
miles yet. No time to ride due to out of town
business trips, but lots of time for maintenance
caused by crappy gas.


14 posted on 10/10/2010 6:12:48 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
Thanks for the info. I am also looking for gas stations in my area that do NOT have ethanol added to their gasoline. The 10% ethanol mixture has noticeably reduced my fuel efficiency.
15 posted on 10/10/2010 9:12:27 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 43north

Exactly! And this is why government spending and interference in the market will not decrease no matter which party is in power. We Americans want our place at the trough. We want the other guy to give up his spot.

There is no incentive for politicians to vote for less spending. They will not be elected or re-elected if they don’t “help” their constituents.


16 posted on 10/10/2010 9:55:41 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Ok, what’s the verdict?

:p


17 posted on 10/10/2010 10:04:33 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson