1 posted on
10/11/2010 6:07:35 PM PDT by
South40
To: South40
It was at 66% NO when I posted this. Its not at 57%.
:-)
2 posted on
10/11/2010 6:12:29 PM PDT by
South40
(Filled with hatred for those who disagree, democrats are the most intolerant bigots on earth)
To: South40
Science should be taught in science courses and religion should be taught in religion courses.
Of course, if school was a separated from state as the left wishes church to be separated from state, this would not even be an issue.
3 posted on
10/11/2010 6:13:03 PM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: South40
Only 66 total votes, should be easy to FReep. The comments on the Alred story are funny, as an added bonus for FReeping.
4 posted on
10/11/2010 6:14:43 PM PDT by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(3(0|\|0/\/\1($ 101: (4P174L1$/\/\ R3QU1r3$ (4P174L. Could it be any more simple?)
To: South40
No, it has no scientific validity.
To: South40
I voted for “No, it has no scientific validity” - that’s what you were looking for, right?
6 posted on
10/11/2010 6:17:09 PM PDT by
frankenMonkey
(I can see November from my window...)
To: South40
Done. Voted no, of course.
7 posted on
10/11/2010 6:22:06 PM PDT by
blowfish
To: South40
Voted no, thanks for the tip
10 posted on
10/11/2010 6:29:50 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
To: South40
Science classes were Monday to Friday, Religious instruction Sunday.
Voted no.
11 posted on
10/11/2010 6:35:33 PM PDT by
MindBender26
(Fighting the "con" in Conservatism on FR since 1998.)
To: South40
Got my NO vote in — I think we’re making a difference.
12 posted on
10/11/2010 6:36:59 PM PDT by
Ferndale
To: South40
13 posted on
10/11/2010 6:44:04 PM PDT by
NRPM
(America again in 2010!)
To: South40
The TOE fairy tale has about run it course from evolution to devolution... All we need now is for these anti-God, we are gods, leftist to start dabbling into it's all God's fault.
To: South40
I notice that that South40 has been banned or suspended. I wonder why.
To: South40
I teach both at my academy, but only one makes sense when both are taught side by side.
To: South40
No, it has no scientific validity
Done.
20 posted on
10/11/2010 7:19:07 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Defend liberty. Destroy socialism.)
To: South40
Is there a “let the school board decide” option?
The Everson line of cases should be overturned.
To: South40
God created evolution to give foolish humans something to argue about.
28 posted on
10/12/2010 5:50:11 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(King: "I have a dream"...Sharpton: "I want a check")
To: South40
The short: If you believe that “all this” came about because of evolution, then you belittle the sacrifice of the Second Adam, Jesus. If you’re a Christian, then evolution demeans your faith in Jesus, who provided a solution for the problem of the first man’s sin.
38 posted on
10/13/2010 8:41:26 PM PDT by
Theo
(May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
To: South40
It should be taught in Bible class.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson