I saw one clip earlier this week from the MS garden show, and he came out wearing a black leather stormtrooper-like overcoat. i overlooked it since the symbol on his sleeve wasn’t a swastika.
But in the context of the other imagery as the article details, the ADL appears to be spot on in its assessment.
Waxman acknowledges that Waters is free to do it. But then he goes on to say Waters crossed a line. What does that mean? If all this amounts to is Waxman criticizing Waters, then fine. If he wants some sort of action taken against Waters, that's a different story.
FWIW, I never liked Roger Waters.