Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Celtic Cross
Note the apostrophe.

Note the advice.

951 posted on 10/18/2010 10:42:46 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Moderates manipulate, extremists use violence, but the goal is the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron; OneWingedShark; Red Steel; edge919; butterdezillion; Fred Nerks

*snip*

“History shows us that a popularly elected, but ineligible, chief executive in the executive branch of a government can be legally and constitutionally removed from office, e.g., Governor Thomas H. Moodie of North Dakota was a prime example.

After he was sworn in and serving as Governor, the North Dakota State Supreme Court ordered Governor Moodie removed from office, after it was determined that he was constitutionally and legally ineligible to serve in the office to which he was popularly elected.”

http://history.nd.gov/exhibits/governors/governors19.html

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-ad-kerchner-v-obama-petition-for.html

____________________

1935: North Dakota Governor Thomas H. Moodie

• After the election, it was alleged that Moodie did not meet the constitutional residency requirements for holding office.

• The attorney general brought a challenge to Moodie’s eligibility for office in the state Supreme Court.

• The House narrowly passed an impeachment resolution that did not mention specific charges and authorized a committee to formulate the charges. Reports indicated that the charge would be a misdemeanor in office—that he took office with knowledge that he was not qualified.

• The attorney general blocked a plan to elevate the lieutenant governor, ruling that impeachment was not complete until the House presented the Senate with articles of impeachment.

• Impeachment proceedings halted when the state Supreme Court took up the case. The court later removed Moodie as unqualified for office.

• On the last day of session, the House voted to expunge the impeachment resolution and all references to it from the journal (“The Gubernatorial Controversy in North Dakota,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 29, No. 3, p. 418 (June 1935)).

http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2008/04/impeachment-of.html


953 posted on 10/18/2010 11:20:57 AM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 951 | View Replies ]

To: All

There have been nine attempts to have the Supreme Court of the United States rule on appeals of lower court decisions on Obama eligibility/natural born citizen lawsuits.

Justices Souter, Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, Alito, and Ginsberg have all had petitions submitted for those Justices to carry the ball with the other Justices.

In case anyone is unaware of how the Supreme Court operates, it takes four of the nine Justices to agree to hear an appeal before the full court. When four Justices agree to hear an appeal, the technical term is “Granting a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari.”

The nine appeals that have been denied are:
1)Berg v Obama denied on January 21, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08a505.htm
2)Beverly v The Federal Elections Commission denied on March 1, 2010
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-794.htm
3)Craig v US, denied on October 5, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08-10817.htm
4)Donofrio v Wells, denied on December 8, 2008
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08a407.htm
5)Herbert v Obama, denied on November 9, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6777.htm
6)Lightfoot v Bowen, denied on January 29, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08a524.htm
7)Rhodes v MacDonald, denied a stay on August 16, 2010
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10a56.htm
8)Schneller v Cortes, denied a stay on September 8, 2009
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08a592.htm
9)Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz, denied on December 15, 2008
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08a469.htm


954 posted on 10/18/2010 11:23:38 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 951 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson