[af_vet_rr]

I am not too down on her SC answer. Personally I think people expecting an almost-LAWYER-like answer

Nobody needed a lawyer-like answer.

O'Donnell spends a fair amount of time complaining about judges legislating from the bench. She should be able to provide a simple example of judges legislating from the bench if she's going to complain about it, otherwise it comes off as a hollow campaign slogan. Pulling a Nobama and saying she'll post it on her website was silly and having to be rescued by Wolf Blitzer with a 40 year old decision was even sillier.

If she actually gets elected, she could be involved in the Senate confirmation of Supreme Court justices as well, and for somebody with that kind of responsibility, there's no excuse for not being able to come up with a single Supreme Court decision that she disagrees with.

I believe she's into the Tea Party stuff, and Kelo v. New London should have came instantly to mind. Given how much she talks about sexual behavior and morals, Lawrence v. Texas should have came to mind as well.

[Bigg Red]

I find it interesting to see how many are focusing on her single flub of the evening after she hit so many homeruns....