Why don’t you just search for a source that says differently, since that is your claim, there is no dispute about Richard Nixon winning the female vote, and JFK winning the men’s vote.
Your personal opinion, and the fact that you knew a female that liked JFK, means nothing.
Did you notice who wrote the article that you linked? A fellow at Center for American Progress and an editor of the New Republic. Apparently they co-authored a book called “The Emerging Democratic Majority.”
That has been a majority that came and went very quickly.
I don’t take anything they say as fact, even the time of day.
However, the world of a half century ago and the voting patterns related to it, have as much relevance to today as the voting patterns of 1910 had to 1960.
I don’t care how men or women voted in 1960. A different world: before “the pill” and before “The Great Society.” That was not the point of my replying to your post with the Washington Post link.
My point was that using those writers was not a credible source.